From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12845 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2009 23:01:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 9032 invoked by uid 48); 8 Jan 2009 23:01:44 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090108230144.9028.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/38669] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Array bounds violation for arguments of elemental subroutine In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00907.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-08 23:01 ------- Huh, the regression state of this bug looks weird. So we have a patch applied on trunk, but known-to-fail is both 4.3.3 and 4.4.0 - but 4.3.2 works? And the target milestone is 4.4.0? If it is really a regression on the branch (4.3.3 vs. 4.3.2) it definitely should be 4.3.3. Changed as such, to get on the radar for 4.3.3 again. Please adjust known-to-work and known-to-fail accordingly. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|4.4.0 |4.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38669