From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15496 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2009 06:07:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 15468 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jan 2009 06:07:09 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090113060709.15467.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/38772] r143102 reveals missed error checking on floating point reads In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg01302.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #21 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 06:07 ------- Reply to comments 16 and 17 which I did not see before my commit. Please make sure the original r143102 is in place when you apply latest patch. It does seem bothersome that the xplor-nih is so sensitive. It is largely due to depending on error conditions. I don't think we want to jump to Daniels patch until we understand what's wrong here. Regardless, I will need a reduced test case to go further. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38772