* [Bug fortran/38853] internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107
2009-01-14 22:14 [Bug fortran/38853] New: internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107 kamaraju at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-14 22:15 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
2009-01-15 6:05 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kamaraju at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-14 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-14 22:14 -------
Created an attachment (id=17105)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17105&action=view)
code to reproduce the internal compiler error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38853] internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107
2009-01-14 22:14 [Bug fortran/38853] New: internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107 kamaraju at gmail dot com
2009-01-14 22:15 ` [Bug fortran/38853] " kamaraju at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-15 6:05 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-01-15 6:21 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2009-01-15 6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-01-15 06:05 -------
doesn't fail in 4.4.0 and 4.3.1.
Since this refers to an 'old' version of trunk (i.e. 4.4. in full development),
I'll close this as fixed. If the problem remains with an up-to-date trunk, or
on any active release branch, please reopen.
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work| |4.4.0 4.3.1 4.1.2
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38853] internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107
2009-01-14 22:14 [Bug fortran/38853] New: internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107 kamaraju at gmail dot com
2009-01-14 22:15 ` [Bug fortran/38853] " kamaraju at gmail dot com
2009-01-15 6:05 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2009-01-15 6:21 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
2009-01-15 6:54 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kamaraju at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-15 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-15 06:21 -------
Joost,
Did you test on the solaris machine or on the i386 machine. I think this is a
architecture specific bug. Could you please confirm the architecture of your
machine?
thanks
raju
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38853] internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107
2009-01-14 22:14 [Bug fortran/38853] New: internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107 kamaraju at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-15 6:21 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-15 6:54 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-12 23:59 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-15 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-15 06:54 -------
First, the code compiles fine on i386 with 4.4.0 20090113.
Second, I support Joost's position in that the ICE you
posted and the subsequent failure of loading f951 in dbx
suggests the problem is in your installation. Please,
update to a newer version and try again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38853] internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107
2009-01-14 22:14 [Bug fortran/38853] New: internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107 kamaraju at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-15 6:54 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-12 23:59 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
2009-02-13 3:39 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-13 4:54 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kamaraju at gmail dot com @ 2009-02-12 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-12 23:59 -------
For those reading the archives, this problem is specific to Solaris 8. The
backtrace from this ICE (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00321.html)
is similar to another problem I encountered with a C program as well. The bug
was reported and fixed as in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38981.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38853] internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107
2009-01-14 22:14 [Bug fortran/38853] New: internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107 kamaraju at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-12 23:59 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
@ 2009-02-13 3:39 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-13 4:54 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-13 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-13 03:39 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> For those reading the archives, this problem is specific to Solaris 8. The
> backtrace from this ICE (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00321.html)
> is similar to another problem I encountered with a C program as well. The bug
> was reported and fixed as in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38981.
>
So, can we close this PR as fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38853] internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107
2009-01-14 22:14 [Bug fortran/38853] New: internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107 kamaraju at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-13 3:39 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-13 4:54 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kamaraju at gmail dot com @ 2009-02-13 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-13 04:53 -------
> So, can we close this PR as fixed?
I thought it was marked as fixed long time back (2009-01-15) by Joost. Anyway,
the answer is yes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread