* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-07-07 15:55 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-09-18 21:55 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2007-07-07 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-07-07 15:55 -------
Subject: Re: New: FAIL: abi_check
> I've seen this with 4.2.1 and 4.3.0.
Attached is the output log (probably somewhat out of order).
Dave
------- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-07-07 15:55 -------
Created an attachment (id=13863)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13863&action=view)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-07 15:55 ` [Bug libstdc++/32666] " dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2007-09-18 21:55 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-18 22:24 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-18 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-18 21:54 -------
These all appear to be fails from missing C99 math functionality: tanl, etc.
So, maybe something with libmath config, config for C99 functions?
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-07 15:55 ` [Bug libstdc++/32666] " dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-09-18 21:55 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-09-18 22:24 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-09-30 21:51 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2007-09-18 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-09-18 22:24 -------
Subject: Re: FAIL: abi_check
> So, maybe something with libmath config, config for C99 functions?
Think so, I see asinf isn't found, yet it's there. I'm going
to remove "-j 2" from my make script. That should make it easier to see
what's happening.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-18 22:24 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2007-09-30 21:51 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-01-13 8:41 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2007-09-30 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-09-30 21:51 -------
Subject: Re: FAIL: abi_check
> ------- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-18 21:54 -------
> These all appear to be fails from missing C99 math functionality: tanl, etc.
>
> So, maybe something with libmath config, config for C99 functions?
I think an update to the baseline symbols is needed. We now have
libc 2.6.
Dave
------- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-09-30 21:51 -------
Created an attachment (id=14274)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14274&action=view)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-30 21:51 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2009-01-13 8:41 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-13 8:43 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-13 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 08:41 -------
From:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00197.html
Looking at the __signbitl issue first. HPPA is the only platform that wants to
export this. Let's try to figure out why.
I see this in include/c_global/cmath
template<typename _Tp>
inline typename __gnu_cxx::__enable_if<__is_arithmetic<_Tp>::__value,
int>::__type
signbit(_Tp __f)
{
typedef typename __gnu_cxx::__promote<_Tp>::__type __type;
return __builtin_signbit(__type(__f));
}
This is from
130443 paolo signbit(_Tp __f)
or
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Nov 26 18:24:54 2007
New Revision: 130443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130443
Log:
2007-11-26 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>
PR libstdc++/25913
* include/c_std/cmath (std::fpclassify, isfinite, isinf, isnan,
isnormal, signbit, isgreater, isgreaterequal, isless, islessequal,
islessgreater, isunordered): Guard with __enable_if and forward
with __promote.
* include/c_global/cmath: Likewise.
* testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/25913.cc: New.
* include/c_std/cmath (__gnu_cxx::__capture_isfinite,
__capture_isinf, __capture_isnan, __capture_isnormal,
__capture_signbit, __capture_isgreater, __capture_isgreaterequal,
__capture_isless, __capture_islessequal, __capture_islessgreater,
__capture_isunordered): Remove.
(std::isfinite, isinf, isnan, isnormal, signbit, isgreater,
isgreaterequal, isless, islessequal, islessgreater, isunordered):
Forward to the corresponding builtin.
* include/c_global/cmath: Likewise.
* include/c_global/cmath (std::atan2, pow): Guard with __enable_if.
OK.
Well, that removed the last uses for libmath. (signbit, copysign. These were
once needed for the complex implementation but seem to not be necessary or use
builtins now, so can be removed.)
The following patch does so.
Dave, can you try it on hppa-linux? I've adjusted the baseline_symbols.txt file
such that it should pass now. If it does not, do 'make check-abi' and attach
the libstdc++.log file please.
I'm not quite sure that the src/compatibility.cc bits are correct. They should
be correct for hppa, but I see that:
alpha-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:atanl@@GLIBCXX_3.4.3
alpha-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:tanl@@GLIBCXX_3.4
hppa-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:atanl@@GLIBCXX_3.4.3
hppa-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:tanl@@GLIBCXX_3.4
hppa-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt.orig:FUNC:atanl@@GLIBCXX_3.4.3
hppa-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt.orig:FUNC:tanl@@GLIBCXX_3.4
mips-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:atanl@@GLIBCXX_3.4.3
mips-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:tanl@@GLIBCXX_3.4
powerpc64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:atanl@GLIBCXX_3.4.3
powerpc64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:tanl@GLIBCXX_3.4
powerpc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:atanl@GLIBCXX_3.4.3
powerpc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:tanl@GLIBCXX_3.4
s390-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:atanl@GLIBCXX_3.4.3
s390-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:tanl@GLIBCXX_3.4
s390x-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:atanl@@GLIBCXX_3.4.3
s390x-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:tanl@@GLIBCXX_3.4
sparc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:atanl@GLIBCXX_3.4.3
sparc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt:FUNC:tanl@GLIBCXX_3.4
all these other ones need it too, and am not sure if the
_GLIBCXX_LONG_DOUBLE_COMPAT macro is true on these other platforms.
As an aside, I think that a lot of the GLIBCXX_CHECK_MATH finding of math
functions at configure time can be seriously reduced now that most of these are
builtins. This should be audited and fixed. We should not really have to define
most of these now.
-benjamin
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-01-13 08:41:37
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-13 8:41 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-13 8:43 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-13 10:02 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-13 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 08:43 -------
Created an attachment (id=17083)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17083&action=view)
check abi fails
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-13 8:43 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-13 10:02 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-15 18:38 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-13 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 10:02 -------
Created an attachment (id=17084)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17084&action=view)
shiny
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #17083|0 |1
is obsolete| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-13 10:02 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-15 18:38 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2009-01-15 20:02 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2009-01-15 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-15 18:38 -------
checked the patch with trunk 20090115:
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for
excess errors)
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 5775
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 79
# of unsupported tests 331
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-15 18:38 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2009-01-15 20:02 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-16 0:24 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-15 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-15 20:02 -------
Subject: Bug 32666
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Jan 15 20:02:11 2009
New Revision: 143406
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143406
Log:
2009-01-15 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
PR libstdc++/32666
* config/abi/post/hppa-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
2009-01-15 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
PR libstdc++/32666
* Makefile.am (hosted_source): Remove libmath directory.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* linkage.m4 (GLIBCXX_CHECK_COMPLEX_MATH_SUPPORT): Remove.
(AC_REPLACE_MATHFUNCS): Remove.
(GLIBCXX_CHECK_MATH_SUPPORT): Remove copysign, copysignl checks as done
in GLIBCXX_CHECK_C99_TR1.
* acinclude.m4: Remove libmath, need_math.
* crossconfig.m4: Remove use of HAVE_COPYSIGN, HAVE_COPYSIGNL,
HAVE_COPYSIGNF, GLIBCXX_CHECK_COMPLEX_MATH_SUPPORT, need_libmath.
* configure.ac: Same.
* configure: Regenerate.
* fragment.am: Fix comment.
* config.h.in: Regenerate.
* src/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* src/Makefile.am: Remove libmath references.
* doc/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* po/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* libsupc++/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* testsuite/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* src/compatibility.cc: Also export long double versions of "C" math
library if hppa-linux.
* config/abi/pre/gnu.ver: Remove unused __signbit exports.
* doc/xml/manual/appendix_contributing.xml: Remove libmath reference.
* libmath: Remove.
* libmath/signbit.c: Same.
* libmath/stubs.c: Same.
* libmath/Makefile.in: Same.
* libmath/copysignf.c: Same.
* libmath/mathconf.h: Same.
* libmath/signbitf.c: Same.
* libmath/Makefile.am: Same.
* libmath/signbitl.c: Same.
Removed:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/libmath/
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/Makefile.am
trunk/libstdc++-v3/Makefile.in
trunk/libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4
trunk/libstdc++-v3/config.h.in
trunk/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/hppa-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt
trunk/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/pre/gnu.ver
trunk/libstdc++-v3/configure
trunk/libstdc++-v3/configure.ac
trunk/libstdc++-v3/crossconfig.m4
trunk/libstdc++-v3/doc/Makefile.in
trunk/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/appendix_contributing.xml
trunk/libstdc++-v3/fragment.am
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.in
trunk/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/Makefile.in
trunk/libstdc++-v3/linkage.m4
trunk/libstdc++-v3/po/Makefile.in
trunk/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am
trunk/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.in
trunk/libstdc++-v3/src/compatibility.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/Makefile.in
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-15 20:02 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-16 0:24 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-01-16 2:26 ` [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check hppa bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2009-01-16 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-01-16 00:24 -------
Subject: Re: FAIL: abi_check
> ------- Comment #9 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 10:02 -------
> Created an attachment (id=17084)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17084&action=view)
> --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17084&action=view)
> shiny
I applied to above on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. With respect to the
previous build, there are a number of new fails:
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/g++ -shared-libgcc
-B/test/gnu/gcc
/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++
-v3/src -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-B/o
pt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/bin/
-B/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/hppa2.0
w-hp-hpux11.11/lib/ -isystem
/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/includ
e -isystem /opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/sys-include -g -O2
-D_GL
IBCXX_ASSERT -fmessage-length=0 -g -O2 -g -O2 -DLOCALEDIR="." -nostdinc++
-I/t
est/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11
.11 -I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/test/gn
u/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backwa
rd -I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v
3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/13450.cc -include bits/stdc++.h
./libtestc++.
a -lm -o ./13450.exe (timeout = 600)
/usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols:
logl (first referenced in /var/tmp//ccQdgBMy.o) (code)
sinl (first referenced in /var/tmp//ccQdgBMy.o) (code)
expl (first referenced in /var/tmp//ccQdgBMy.o) (code)
powl (first referenced in /var/tmp//ccQdgBMy.o) (code)
atan2l (first referenced in /var/tmp//ccQdgBMy.o) (code)
sqrtl (first referenced in /var/tmp//ccQdgBMy.o) (code)
cosl (first referenced in /var/tmp//ccQdgBMy.o) (code)
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check hppa
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-16 0:24 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2009-01-16 2:26 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-16 2:27 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-16 2:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 02:26 -------
Ouch. I see this also on arm-elf crosses, whoops.
Here's a patch that I'm currently testing on cross. If it fixes it, then I'll
check it in and then please try on hpux.
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|FAIL: abi_check |FAIL: abi_check hppa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check hppa
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-16 2:26 ` [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check hppa bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-16 2:27 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-16 20:51 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-16 2:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 02:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=17112)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17112&action=view)
add in stubs.c for long double only
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check hppa
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-16 2:27 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-16 20:51 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-01-17 16:03 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2009-01-16 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-01-16 20:51 -------
Subject: Re: FAIL: abi_check hppa
> add in stubs.c for long double only
I think we also need float stubs. I saw some problems with
floorf in the testsuite in my last build.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check hppa
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-16 20:51 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2009-01-17 16:03 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-01-20 5:51 ` bkoz at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2009-01-17 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-01-17 16:02 -------
Subject: Re: FAIL: abi_check hppa
> I think we also need float stubs. I saw some problems with
> floorf in the testsuite in my last build.
There are four testsuite fails due to floorf being missing. Here's one:
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/g++ -shared-libgcc
-B/test/gnu/gcc
/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++
-v3/src -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-B/o
pt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/bin/
-B/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/hppa2.0
w-hp-hpux11.11/lib/ -isystem
/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/includ
e -isystem /opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/sys-include -g -O2
-D_GL
IBCXX_ASSERT -fmessage-length=0 -g -O2 -g -O2 -DLOCALEDIR="." -nostdinc++
-I/t
est/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11
.11 -I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/test/gn
u/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backwa
rd -I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v
3/testsuite/tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/12_ellint_1/check_nan.c
c -include bits/stdc++.h ./libtestc++.a -lm -o ./check_nan.exe
(timeout
= 600)
/usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols:
floorf (first referenced in /var/tmp//ccLVzphs.o) (code)
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
...
FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/12_ellint_1/check_nan.cc
(tes
t for excess errors)
Other f functions that are checked for and missing on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
are, ceilf, finitef, frexpf, hypotf, isnanf, ldexpf, modff, sincosf, strtof.
HP-UX 10 is the same except for having finitef and isnanf.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check hppa
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-17 16:03 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2009-01-20 5:51 ` bkoz at redhat dot com
2009-01-20 15:36 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-01-20 19:25 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at redhat dot com @ 2009-01-20 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from bkoz at redhat dot com 2009-01-20 05:51 -------
The float versions were added in r143457
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-01/msg00470.html
hpux 11 looks fine, but I don't see 10.x results.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check hppa
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-20 5:51 ` bkoz at redhat dot com
@ 2009-01-20 15:36 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-01-20 19:25 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2009-01-20 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-01-20 15:36 -------
Subject: Re: FAIL: abi_check hppa
> The float versions were added in r143457
The abi check problem is fixed, and the hpux test results on
hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 are again ok.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/32666] FAIL: abi_check hppa
2007-07-07 15:47 [Bug libstdc++/32666] New: FAIL: abi_check danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-20 15:36 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2009-01-20 19:25 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-20 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #19 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-20 19:25 -------
Fixed for 4.4.0
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread