From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18689 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2009 06:50:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 18643 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2009 06:50:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090116065011.18642.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/38152] [4.4 Regression] procedure pointers as module variables In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg01716.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 06:50 ------- > Can we still get this into 4.4? In a way the ICE is a regression, since 4.3 > just gave an error message (stating that procedure pointers are not > implemented) but no ICE. I think one could; the patch only affects proc pointer and thus even if it breaks, it would not be that bad. Note: There are currently only 102 serious regressions left (6 P1 regressions; goal < 100 P1-P3 regressions, 0 P1 regressions) thus branching will be relatively soon. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38152