From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32482 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2009 03:05:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 32444 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jan 2009 03:05:22 -0000 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090122030522.32443.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/38439] I/O PD edit descriptor inconsistency In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg02349.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-22 03:05 ------- Further information: PD is not the problem here at all. The problem is that when using the D edit descriptor, one is not allowed to also specify the exponent digits. Thus: '(1pD24.15)' is valid While: '(1pD24.15e4)' is invalid -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-01-22 03:05:22 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38439