public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
@ 2009-01-14 22:00 dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
2009-01-14 22:08 ` [Bug fortran/38852] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-14 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The UBOUND function returns zero for subscript triplets that have a negative
stride, such as 5:4:-1. Fails with both compile-time expressions and run-time
expressions. LBOUND and SHAPE work correctly on the same triplets.
This might be related to 35685 since I think this started soon after 35685 was
closed.
Dick Hendrickson
program try_je0031
! fails on Windows XP
! gcc version 4.4.0 20081219 (experimental) [trunk revision 142842] (GCC)
integer ida(4)
real dda(5,5,5,5,5)
call JE0031(IDA,DDA,2,5,-2)
end
SUBROUTINE JE0031(IDA,DDA,nf2,nf5,mf2)
INTEGER IDA(4)
REAL DLA(:,:,:,:)
REAL DDA(5,5,5,5,5)
POINTER DLA
TARGET DDA
DLA => DDA(2:3, 1:3:2, 5:4:-1, NF2, NF5:NF2:MF2)
IDA = UBOUND(DLA)
if (any(ida /= 2)) print *, ' run-time ubound', ida
DLA => DDA(2:3, 1:3:2, 5:4:-1, 2, 5:2:-2)
IDA = UBOUND(DLA)
if (any(ida /= 2)) print *, 'compile-time ubound', ida
!these work
DLA => DDA(2:3, 1:3:2, 5:4:-1, 2, 5:2:-2)
IDA = shape(DLA)
if (any(ida /= 2)) print *, ' compile-time shape', ida
DLA => DDA(2:3, 1:3:2, 5:4:-1, 2, 5:2:-2)
IDA = LBOUND(DLA)
if (any(ida /= 1)) print *, 'compile-time lbound', ida
END SUBROUTINE
C:\gfortran>gfortran try_je0031.f
C:\gfortran>a
run-time ubound 2 2 0 0
compile-time ubound 2 2 0 0
--
Summary: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-14 22:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-01-15 5:56 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2009-01-14 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-14 22:08 -------
Confirmed on i686-apple-darwin9/trunk, it also fails with gfortran 4.2.3 and
4.3.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
2009-01-14 22:08 ` [Bug fortran/38852] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2009-01-15 5:56 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-01-15 5:58 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2009-01-15 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-01-15 05:56 -------
looks like this always failed ?
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |32834
nThis| |
Keywords| |wrong-code
Known to fail| |4.2.3 4.3.3 4.4.0 4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
2009-01-14 22:08 ` [Bug fortran/38852] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-01-15 5:56 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2009-01-15 5:58 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-01-19 18:48 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2009-01-15 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-01-15 05:57:57
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-15 5:58 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2009-01-19 18:48 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-20 22:30 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-19 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-19 18:48 -------
DLA => DDA(2:3, 1:3:2, 5:4:-1, NF2, NF5:NF2:MF2)
The descriptor built for DLA has negative strides for dimension >= 3.
This makes ubound fail.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-19 18:48 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-20 22:30 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-22 12:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-20 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-20 22:29 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> DLA => DDA(2:3, 1:3:2, 5:4:-1, NF2, NF5:NF2:MF2)
>
> The descriptor built for DLA has negative strides for dimension >= 3.
> This makes ubound fail.
>
Forget this
DLA => DDA(2:3, 1:3:2, 5:4:-1, NF2, NF5:NF2:MF2)
dla.dim[0].lbound = 1;
dla.dim[0].ubound = 2;
dla.dim[0].stride = 1;
dla.dim[1].lbound = 1;
dla.dim[1].ubound = 2;
dla.dim[1].stride = 10;
dla.dim[2].lbound = 1;
dla.dim[2].ubound = 2;
dla.dim[2].stride = -25;
dla.dim[3].lbound = 1;
dla.dim[3].ubound = D.1563 + 1;
dla.dim[3].stride = D.1561 * 625;
There is a distinction to make between user-provided bounds and
front-end-generated bounds.
In the former case (original array) the array is non-empty if ubound >
lbound and stride > 0 or if ubound < lbound and stride < 0.
In the latter case, it is non-empty if ubound > lbound only. Comparing
ubound and lbound according to the stride to check for zero-sized arrays
doesn't make sense in this case (see dimension 2 of dla).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-20 22:30 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-22 12:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-25 18:22 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-22 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-22 12:39 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> In the latter case, it is non-empty if ubound > lbound only. Comparing
> ubound and lbound according to the stride to check for zero-sized arrays
> doesn't make sense in this case (see dimension 2 of dla).
Indeed - the fix can be done in gfc_conv_intrinsic_bound. I will regtest
tonight and submit accordingly.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2009-01-15 05:57:57 |2009-01-22 12:39:50
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-22 12:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-25 18:22 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-25 21:08 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-25 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-25 18:21 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
>
> > In the latter case, it is non-empty if ubound > lbound only. Comparing
> > ubound and lbound according to the stride to check for zero-sized arrays
> > doesn't make sense in this case (see dimension 2 of dla).
>
> Indeed - the fix can be done in gfc_conv_intrinsic_bound. I will regtest
> tonight and submit accordingly.
>
> Paul
>
Wrong! - this patch causes several regressions. I'll have to see how the code
in the pointer assignment should be changed.
Cheers
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-25 18:22 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-25 21:08 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-27 12:16 ` [Bug fortran/38852] [Fix pending] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-25 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-25 21:08 -------
Created an attachment (id=17182)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17182&action=view)
A provisional patch for the PR
It take back what I said previously:-)
The attached bootstraps and regtests OK.
I need to put some thought into the possibility that some fringe cases might
fail, where the lbound is unity.
Cheers
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] [Fix pending] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-25 21:08 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-27 12:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-28 17:31 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-27 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-27 12:16 -------
I have done most of the work on the corner cases and the fix below looks good.
I am marking it as pending for temporary book-keeping purposes.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|UBOUND fails for negative |[Fix pending] UBOUND fails
|stride triplets |for negative stride triplets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] [Fix pending] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-27 12:16 ` [Bug fortran/38852] [Fix pending] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-28 17:31 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-28 17:33 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-28 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 17:31 -------
*** Bug 39006 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] [Fix pending] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-28 17:31 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-28 17:33 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-28 20:52 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-28 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 17:33 -------
Marked up the severity to that of PR39006.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] [Fix pending] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-28 17:33 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-28 20:52 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-28 21:49 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-28 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 20:52 -------
Created an attachment (id=17204)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17204&action=view)
Updated patch
Following discussion on fortran list and #gfortran, a more restrictive test is
needed.
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #17182|0 |1
is obsolete| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] [Fix pending] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-28 20:52 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-28 21:49 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-28 21:52 ` [Bug fortran/38852] [4.3] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-28 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 21:49 -------
Subject: Bug 38852
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 28 21:48:53 2009
New Revision: 143743
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143743
Log:
2009-01-28 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/38852
PR fortran/39006
* trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_conv_intrinsic_bound): Use the array
descriptor ubound for UBOUND, when the array lbound == 1.
2009-01-28 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/38852
PR fortran/39006
* gfortran.dg/bound_6.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bound_6.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] [4.3] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-28 21:49 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-28 21:52 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-19 6:44 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-19 6:44 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-28 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 21:52 -------
Fixed on trunk.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|critical |normal
Summary|[Fix pending] UBOUND fails |[4.3] UBOUND fails for
|for negative stride triplets|negative stride triplets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] [4.3] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-28 21:52 ` [Bug fortran/38852] [4.3] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-19 6:44 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-19 6:44 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-19 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-19 06:43 -------
Subject: Bug 38852
Author: pault
Date: Thu Feb 19 06:43:15 2009
New Revision: 144286
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144286
Log:
2009-02-19 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/38852
PR fortran/39006
* trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_conv_intrinsic_bound): Use the array
descriptor ubound for UBOUND, when the array lbound == 1.
2009-02-19 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/38852
PR fortran/39006
* gfortran.dg/bound_6.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bound_6.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38852] [4.3] UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-19 6:44 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-19 6:44 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-19 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-19 06:44 -------
Fixed on trunk and 4.3
Thanks for the report
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-19 6:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-14 22:00 [Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com
2009-01-14 22:08 ` [Bug fortran/38852] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-01-15 5:56 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-01-15 5:58 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2009-01-19 18:48 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-20 22:30 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-22 12:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-25 18:22 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-25 21:08 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-27 12:16 ` [Bug fortran/38852] [Fix pending] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-28 17:31 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-28 17:33 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-28 20:52 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-28 21:49 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-28 21:52 ` [Bug fortran/38852] [4.3] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-19 6:44 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-19 6:44 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).