public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/38851] [4.4 regression] Compiler warns about uninitialized variable that is an object with a constructor
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090124142318.5267.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-38851-17188@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 14:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=17175)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17175&action=view)
semi-working patch
Patch. Regresses
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 51)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 59)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 60)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 61)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 62)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 66)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 74)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 75)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 76)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 77)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 78)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 79)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 83)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 91)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 92)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 93)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 94)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 98)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 106)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 107)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 108)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 109)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 110)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 111)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 115)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 123)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 124)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 125)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 126)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 130)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 138)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 139)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 140)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for errors, line 141)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1n.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv1p.C (test for excess errors)
... (some more of these)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv7n.C (test for errors, line 83)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv7n.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv7p.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv8p.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/empty1.C execution test
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38851
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-24 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-14 21:04 [Bug c++/38851] New: " nvachhar at google dot com
2009-01-14 21:05 ` [Bug c++/38851] " nvachhar at google dot com
2009-01-14 21:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-21 22:19 ` [Bug middle-end/38851] [4.3 regression] " bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-21 22:41 ` [Bug middle-end/38851] [4.4 " bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-21 22:49 ` [Bug c++/38851] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-21 22:59 ` [Bug middle-end/38851] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-23 19:32 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2009-01-24 9:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-24 9:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-24 10:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-24 14:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2009-01-24 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-25 18:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-25 19:45 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-25 20:00 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-01-25 20:04 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2009-01-25 20:45 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-01-25 22:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-26 9:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-26 9:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-30 17:32 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090124142318.5267.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).