public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rob1weld at aol dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/38946] gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran failing tests that worked previously
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090125170000.4330.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-38946-13830@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com  2009-01-25 16:59 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > === gfortran tests ===
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_23.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution
> > ...
> > 
> > Error: Symbol 'max_fld_hed' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
> >
> This error (like the others) is expected: we test that the compiler gives the
> expected output. Look for lines starting with FAIL for real failures. 
> But as they are run-time, it won't help probably. 
> 
> 
> Quite many of the newly-failing tests are about I/O; I suspect the following > to be the culprit. Could you try before/after this?
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r143462 | pault | 2009-01-17 12:32:02 +0100 (sam. 17 janv. 2009) | 17 lines
> 2009-01-17  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
>         PR fortran/34955
>         * trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_conv_intrinsic_array_transfer):
> ...
> Note that some of the tests require specific features (such as denormalized
> long doubles) and are x-failed(which means: known to fail) on some targets or
> have some dg-require-effective-targets conditions on them. Thus, maybe the
> correct behaviour for these tests is to fail on solaris. 
> 

They worked last week.

I am in favor of them working again and enabling, rather than disabling,
as many features as possible. That includes both in gcc and in the Testsuite.
I don't use Fortran but will offer a little assistance if I can. 

Here is my most recent test. Above you ask "Could you try before/after this"
do you mean compile and run the Testuite on bothboth "r143461" and "r143463"?


Results for 4.4.0 20090125 (experimental) [trunk revision 143660] (GCC)
testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-01/msg02585.html


Thanks for fixing this,
Rob


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-25 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-23 15:19 [Bug fortran/38946] New: " rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-01-23 20:04 ` [Bug fortran/38946] " mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-25 17:00 ` rob1weld at aol dot com [this message]
2009-01-25 17:35 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-01-26 18:42 ` [Bug fortran/38946] [trunk regression] " mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-26 19:29 ` [Bug testsuite/38946] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-27 15:50 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-01-27 16:00 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-01-27 19:38   ` [Bug testsuite/38946] [trunk regression]?gcc " DJ Delorie
2009-01-27 16:18 ` [Bug testsuite/38946] [trunk regression] gcc " rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-01-27 19:38 ` dj at redhat dot com
2009-01-27 22:29 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-01-27 22:45 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-01-27 23:26 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-01-27 23:47 ` [Bug testsuite/38946] [4.4 Regression] " rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-01-29 12:32 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-01-30  3:25 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-02-01 13:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-21 16:02 ` [Bug testsuite/38946] [4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-22 10:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-15 12:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-21 13:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-30  9:01 ` [Bug testsuite/38946] [4.4/4.5/4.6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-04 12:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-07 16:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-06-07 16:49 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-07 16:49 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-20  2:06 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2010-06-25 18:56 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-25 19:25 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-25 19:26 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-06-25 20:21 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-25 20:34 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-06-25 20:42 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-25 20:43 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-06-25 21:33 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-09 19:18 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-20 18:46 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2010-07-20 19:23 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21  4:37 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21  7:56 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-21  9:06 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21  9:07 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21  9:09 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-23  8:44 ` rob1weld at aol dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090125170000.4330.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).