From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10306 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2009 15:54:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 10221 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jan 2009 15:54:21 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090127155421.10220.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug testsuite/36443] [4.3/4.4 Regression]: HOSTCC doesn't work with installed gcc In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg02970.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #33 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 15:54 ------- I think it is a very bad idea to set GCC_EXEC_PREFIX for "make check". If some people want binary tools, which aren't the part of installed gcc, in the GCC_EXEC_PREFIX directory when running "make check", they should use a branch or local change for this purpose. They shouldn't impose their desires on all gcc developers. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36443