From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-274276-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31881 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2009 11:50:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 31071 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jan 2009 11:50:20 -0000
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:50:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20090128115020.31070.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-38985-7849@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/38985] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] missing constraints for pointers accessed directly via their address
In-Reply-To: <bug-38985-7849@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "bonzini at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg03078.txt.bz2



------- Comment #13 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2009-01-28 11:50 -------
Aren't loads protected by the gimple_set_has_volatile_ops anyway?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38985