From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1404 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2009 13:24:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 1344 invoked by uid 48); 29 Jan 2009 13:23:48 -0000 Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090129132348.1343.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/39002] [4.4 Regression] codegen bug, stack pointer is not restored In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg03215.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #23 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-29 13:23 ------- I don't see why ix86_expand_epilogue should be changed. Do you have some testcase which shows where your change improves generated code? I can certainly test on Linux, but as frame.nsseregs is always 0 there, it should make zilch difference. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39002