From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1979 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2009 15:00:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 1935 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jan 2009 15:00:41 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090130150041.1934.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/38928] infinite loop on error message in C++ only In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "bangerth at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg03347.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-01-30 15:00 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > However, I'm still analyzing whether we really want to reject. As data points, > ICC doesn't, even in strict mode; on the other hand Comeau rejects the > identifier "family" already... Does it reject the code because this form of member initializer (where you name individual members) is really a C99 thing, not C++98? W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38928