public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/38541]  New: function parameter type T(*)[]
@ 2008-12-16 12:08 wolfgang dot roehrl at gi-de dot com
  2009-01-30 15:20 ` [Bug c++/38541] " bangerth at gmail dot com
  2009-01-30 15:20 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: wolfgang dot roehrl at gi-de dot com @ 2008-12-16 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Dear all,

I would like to post a fault report for the GNU C/C++ compiler 4.3.0.

Used invokation line for the GNU C++ compiler:

gcc -c -x c++ -ansi -Wall -Werror -mcpu=603e -fverbose-asm -mbig
    -mmultiple -mstring -mstrict-align -meabi -msdata -fno-common
    -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -O3 -fno-section-anchors
    -I<different include paths>
    -D<different #define's>
    X.CPP -oX.O


// example program

template <typename T_>
bool f (T_* p);

bool g ()
{ return f(static_cast<int(*)[]>(0)); }


GNU accepts the code frgment above which is illegal. It is illegal because
a function parameter like "int(*)[]" is illegal (8.3.5/6).

BTW, the Comeau online compiler rejects the code above. 

Kind regards
W. Roehrl


-- 
           Summary: function parameter type T(*)[]
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: wolfgang dot roehrl at gi-de dot com
 GCC build triplet: athlon-redhat-linux
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-mingw32
GCC target triplet: powerpc-rtems4.9


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38541


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/38541] function parameter type T(*)[]
  2008-12-16 12:08 [Bug c++/38541] New: function parameter type T(*)[] wolfgang dot roehrl at gi-de dot com
@ 2009-01-30 15:20 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
  2009-01-30 15:20 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-30 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

bangerth at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-01-30 15:20:38
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38541


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/38541] function parameter type T(*)[]
  2008-12-16 12:08 [Bug c++/38541] New: function parameter type T(*)[] wolfgang dot roehrl at gi-de dot com
  2009-01-30 15:20 ` [Bug c++/38541] " bangerth at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-30 15:20 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-30 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com  2009-01-30 15:20 -------
Confirmed. The original testcase had a function argument of type
pointer-to-pointer-to-array-of-unknown-size, but this testcase
also fails:
----------------------------
template <typename T_>
bool f (T_ p);

bool g ()
{ return f<int(*)[]>(0); }
-----------------------------


-- 

bangerth at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|                            |4.3.1 4.4.0 2.95.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38541


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/38541] function parameter type T(*)[]
       [not found] <bug-38541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-12-11  8:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-16  2:16 ` de34 at live dot cn
@ 2021-12-16  2:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-16  2:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38541

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
              Alias|                            |cwg393
             Blocks|                            |94404

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
[Moved to DR at the November, 2014 meeting.]


So closing as invalid.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
[Bug 94404] [meta-bug] C++ core issues

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/38541] function parameter type T(*)[]
       [not found] <bug-38541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2021-12-11  8:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-16  2:16 ` de34 at live dot cn
  2021-12-16  2:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: de34 at live dot cn @ 2021-12-16  2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38541

Jiang An <de34 at live dot cn> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |de34 at live dot cn

--- Comment #3 from Jiang An <de34 at live dot cn> ---
These cases are made valid by CWG DR393 (https://wg21.link/cwg393).

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/38541] function parameter type T(*)[]
       [not found] <bug-38541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-12-11  8:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-16  2:16 ` de34 at live dot cn
  2021-12-16  2:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-11  8:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38541

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|                            |

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Are we sure this is invalid code? GCC, ICC, clang and MSVC all accept both
testcases.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-16  2:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-16 12:08 [Bug c++/38541] New: function parameter type T(*)[] wolfgang dot roehrl at gi-de dot com
2009-01-30 15:20 ` [Bug c++/38541] " bangerth at gmail dot com
2009-01-30 15:20 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
     [not found] <bug-38541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-12-11  8:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-16  2:16 ` de34 at live dot cn
2021-12-16  2:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).