From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7995 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2009 16:11:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 7921 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jan 2009 16:11:22 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090130161122.7920.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/18624] GCC does not detect local variable set but never used In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg03370.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #13 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-30 16:11 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > > For source codes [a-k]*, there where 906 occurrences of the "set but > not used" warning from Intel C/C++. > @dcb I think nobody is discussing that we would want such warning (in some form or another) in GCC. We do not need more rationale or evidence supporting it. We need someone to write the patch. Just that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18624