* [Bug c++/38072] ICE on valid code.
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
@ 2008-11-10 17:41 ` c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
2008-11-10 17:46 ` [Bug target/38072] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: c dot galambos at omniperception dot com @ 2008-11-10 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from c dot galambos at omniperception dot com 2008-11-10 17:39 -------
Created an attachment (id=16646)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16646&action=view)
Preprocessor output .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/38072] ICE on valid code.
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
2008-11-10 17:41 ` [Bug c++/38072] " c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
@ 2008-11-10 17:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-10 17:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/38072] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-10 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-10 17:44 -------
Works on the trunk.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c++ |target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] ICE on valid code.
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
2008-11-10 17:41 ` [Bug c++/38072] " c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
2008-11-10 17:46 ` [Bug target/38072] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-10 17:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-10 19:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/38072] ICE during inlining of " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-10 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-10 17:48 -------
It was ICEing in
0x002084ac in remap_ssa_name (name=0x18e9c40, id=0xbffff4cc) at
/Users/apinski/src/local/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:192
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|target |tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-10 17:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/38072] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-10 19:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-10 19:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-10 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-10 19:20 -------
Here is a better backtrace:
#0 remap_ssa_name (name=0xb7d3c000, id=0xbfda005c) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:192
#1 0x08127db4 in copy_body_r (tp=0xb7d3dc28, walk_subtrees=0xbfd9fc78,
data=0xbfda005c) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:599
#2 0x083f195b in walk_tree_1 (tp=0xb7d3dc28, func=0x8127a90 <copy_body_r>,
data=0xbfda005c, pset=0x0, lh=0) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree.c:8618
#3 0x083f1a95 in walk_tree_1 (tp=0xb7d2ce1c, func=0x8127a90 <copy_body_r>,
data=0xbfda005c, pset=0x0, lh=0) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree.c:8857
#4 0x0812735d in remap_type_1 (type=0xb7d2cb60, id=0xbfda005c) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:403
#5 0x08127517 in remap_type (type=0xb7d2cb60, id=0xbfda005c) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:430
#6 0x0812743e in remap_type_1 (type=0xb7d2cc40, id=0xbfda005c) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:311
#7 0x08127517 in remap_type (type=0xb7d2cc40, id=0xbfda005c) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:430
#8 0x08126f97 in remap_decl (decl=0xb7d35720, id=0xbfda005c) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:262
#9 0x081278d7 in remap_ssa_name (name=0xb7d3c2a4, id=0xbfda005c) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:176
#10 0x08127db4 in copy_body_r (tp=0xb7d3e0a0, walk_subtrees=0xbfd9fe48,
data=0xbfda005c) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:599
#11 0x083f195b in walk_tree_1 (tp=0xb7d3e0a0, func=0x8127a90 <copy_body_r>,
data=0xbfda005c, pset=0x0, lh=0) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree.c:8618
#12 0x083f1a95 in walk_tree_1 (tp=0xbfd9ff0c, func=0x8127a90 <copy_body_r>,
data=0xbfda005c, pset=0x0, lh=0) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree.c:8857
#13 0x08128e59 in copy_bb (id=0xbfda005c, bb=0xb7d36168,
frequency_scale=-1210851216, count_scale=1) at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:826
#14 0x0812979f in copy_cfg_body (id=0xbfda005c, count=<value optimized out>,
frequency=0, entry_block_map=0xb7d36fb4, exit_block_map=0xb7d367bc)
at /home/apinski/src/gcc-sony/gcc-4.3-clean/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c:1367
--- CUT ---
And a reduced testcase:
typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
inline void* operator new[](unsigned, void* __p) throw() { return __p; }
void *malloc(size_t);
template<typename DataT> inline void ConstructRawArray(DataT *data,unsigned
size) {
new(data) DataT[size];
}
template<typename DataT> struct SingleBufferBodyC
{
DataT *buff;
void *operator new(size_t s,void *mem) { }
inline unsigned Size() const { }
SingleBufferBodyC(unsigned nsize)
{
ConstructRawArray(this->buff,this->Size());
}
};
template<typename DataT> struct SingleBufferC
{
SingleBufferC(unsigned size)
{
SingleBufferBodyC<DataT> *ret = reinterpret_cast<SingleBufferBodyC<DataT>
*> (malloc(8)) ;
new(ret) SingleBufferBodyC<DataT>(size);
}
};
struct TestObjC {
TestObjC() { }
int val;
};
int TestSingleBuffer() {
SingleBufferC<TestObjC> buff3(100);
}
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC build triplet|i686-apple-darwin9 |
GCC host triplet|i686-apple-darwin9 |
GCC target triplet|i686-apple-darwin9 |
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Summary|ICE on valid code. |ICE during inlining of valid
| |code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-10 19:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/38072] ICE during inlining of " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-10 19:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-10 23:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-10 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-10 19:27 -------
Still happens on the 4.3 branch as of 4.3.3 20080918. Building a new compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-10 19:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-10 23:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-19 22:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-10 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-10 23:57 -------
Confirmed, still fails today on 4.3 branch.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |4.3.0 4.3.3
Known to work| |4.4.0 4.1.1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-11-10 23:57:21
date| |
Summary|ICE during inlining of valid|[4.3 Regression] ICE during
|code |inlining of valid code
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-10 23:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-19 22:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-30 23:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-19 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-19 22:57 -------
We are remapping
(gdb) up
#4 0x08330b6c in remap_type_1 (type=0xb7d835b0, id=0xbfbe96a4)
at /home/richard/src/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/tree-inline.c:403
403 walk_tree (&TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (new), copy_body_r, id, NULL);
which contains an SSA_NAME that is in the freelist. Both size and unit-size
are expressions.
iftmp.1_6 = (struct TestObjC[0:size.0 + -1] *) D.1854_5
it looks like that we do not gimplify all of the parameter types.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-19 22:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-30 23:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-28 18:52 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-30 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-30 23:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-28 18:52 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-24 10:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-28 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-28 18:50 -------
Shorter testcase without templates:
==========================================================================
inline void* operator new[](__SIZE_TYPE__, void* p) throw() { return p; }
struct A
{
A() {}
int i;
};
struct B
{
static void foo(A *p, int n) { new(p) A[n]; }
B() { foo(p, 1); }
A* p;
};
B b;
==========================================================================
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Keywords| |monitored
Known to work|4.4.0 4.1.1 |4.4.0 4.1.1 4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-28 18:52 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-24 10:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-30 22:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-24 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 10:20 -------
GCC 4.3.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.3 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-24 10:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-30 22:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-31 0:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-30 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-30 22:20 -------
*** Bug 39047 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dima at debian dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-30 22:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-31 0:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-10 12:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-31 0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-31 00:08 -------
Hm, we are remapping
iftmp.1_6 = (struct A[0:n.0 + -1] *) D.1755_5
where the variable array pointer type contains in TYPE_SIZE_UNIT n.0_3 * 4
and n.0_3 is on the free list.
I wonder how we end up with an SSA name there in the first place. Likely
a tree sharing issue. TYPE_SIZE is (bit_size_type) SAVE_EXPR <n.0> * 32
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-31 0:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-07-10 12:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-11 15:35 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
` (4 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-07-10 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 12:18 -------
would be interesting to know what fixed this on the trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-07-10 12:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-07-11 15:35 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2009-07-11 15:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mikpe at it dot uu dot se @ 2009-07-11 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-11 15:34 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> would be interesting to know what fixed this on the trunk.
A binary search on trunk identified revision 138207 as the point that fixed
this ICE. That revision is a large merge from gimple-tuples-branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-07-11 15:35 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
@ 2009-07-11 15:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-14 19:51 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
` (2 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-07-11 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 15:40 -------
Bah. So this then becomes "it would be interesting to know what fixed this on
the gimple-tuples-branch" ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-07-11 15:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-07-14 19:51 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2009-08-04 12:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mikpe at it dot uu dot se @ 2009-07-14 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-14 19:51 -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> Bah. So this then becomes "it would be interesting to know what fixed this on
> the gimple-tuples-branch" ...
Revision 134191 fixed this on gimple-tuples-branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-07-14 19:51 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
@ 2009-08-04 12:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:29 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/38072] [4.3 Regression] ICE during inlining of valid code
2008-11-10 17:37 [Bug c++/38072] New: ICE on valid code c dot galambos at omniperception dot com
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-22 18:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:12 -------
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread