public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/36296] bogus uninitialized warning (loop representation, VRP missed-optimization)
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090203002753.24365.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-36296-16207@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #15 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-03 00:27 -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> I'm not sure whether following warrants a new bug entry so doing it here,
> sorry,
> if it was inappropriate.
That is a different case. This PR is about loops. Your case is about
initialization and use guarded by the same predicate. I think there is already
a bug report for this. But it is always better to open a new bug report in case
of doubt.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36296
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-03 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-22 7:28 [Bug c/36296] New: wrong warning about potential uninitialized variable zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr
2008-05-22 8:22 ` [Bug middle-end/36296] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-22 8:34 ` vincent at vinc17 dot org
2008-05-22 10:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-22 11:02 ` vincent at vinc17 dot org
2008-05-22 11:23 ` vincent at vinc17 dot org
2008-05-28 7:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-28 8:19 ` vincent at vinc17 dot org
2008-08-18 17:25 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-18 22:59 ` vincent at vinc17 dot org
2008-08-18 23:39 ` [Bug middle-end/36296] bogus uninitialized warning (loop representation) manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-19 1:33 ` vincent at vinc17 dot org
2008-08-19 2:34 ` [Bug middle-end/36296] bogus uninitialized warning (loop representation, VRP missed-optimization) manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-25 3:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-02 23:44 ` av1474 at comtv dot ru
2009-02-03 0:28 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
[not found] <bug-36296-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-04-17 8:40 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2013-04-17 9:19 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-17 9:32 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-17 9:37 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-17 11:17 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2013-04-17 12:25 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2013-11-20 0:55 ` law at redhat dot com
2014-02-16 13:13 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090203002753.24365.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).