From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18295 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2009 18:50:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 18195 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2009 18:49:57 -0000 Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090207184957.18194.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/38913] Fortran does not set TYPE_CANONICAL properly In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenther at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00664.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-02-07 18:49 ------- Subject: Re: Fortran does not set TYPE_CANONICAL properly On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk wrote: > ------- Comment #6 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-02-07 15:32 ------- > (In reply to comment #5) > > I guess that since Richard says that it's a problem, we had better confirm > > it:-) > > Do we need a bugzilla field 'confirmatio ad verecundiam' ;-) Haha ;) OTOH I am no longer convinced it is a real problem, but I also only have some F77 skills, so no testcases with whatever Fortran calls "structs" from me ;) Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38913