From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21977 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2009 14:13:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 21952 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2009 14:13:23 -0000 Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090208141323.21951.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/18617] missed volatile variable optimizations In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00722.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-08 14:13 ------- This is a really old bug. Since 2005, a lot has happened in GCC. Could someone interested in AVR please check whether this is still an issue? -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18617