public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcj/5303] Undocumented java programs
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090209162039.25023.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-5303-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-09 16:20 -------
Would the Java maintainers accept a patch to remove addr2name.awk?

As far as I can tell, it is no longer used after:

2002-08-24  Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>

        * Makefile.am (libgcj_la_SOURCES): Remove name-finder.cc.
        (core_java_source_files): Add VMThrowable.java and NameFinder.java
        (nat_source_files): Remove natThrowable.cc, add natVMThrowable.cc
        and natNameFinder.cc.
        * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
        * name-finder.cc: Removed.

The original introduction was:

2000-03-24  Andrew Haley  <aph@cygnus.com>

        * Makefile.am: Add file addr2name.awk.
        * Makefile.in: Rebuilt.
        * addr2name.awk: New file.
        * name-finder.cc (_Jv_name_finder): Call addr2name.awk to do name
        lookups on ia64.

I can't find any references to addr2name.awk in the current sourcebase.

If it's OK, may I check in the obvious patch to remove all traces from
Makefile.am and remove the file itself?

Thanks,

-- Mark


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org, aph at redhat dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303


       reply	other threads:[~2009-02-09 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-5303-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2009-02-09 16:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2009-02-09 16:46 ` aph at redhat dot com
2009-02-09 22:45 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-09 22:53 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090209162039.25023.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).