public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug inline-asm/31693] Incorrectly assigned registers to operands for ARM inline asm Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:36:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20090210143621.6207.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-31693-14457@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #6 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-10 14:36 ------- This is not a bug, but a problem with your source code. In order to understand why, you need to pre-process the code and look at the output: ... void *memset_arm9(void *a, int b, int c) { return ({ uint8_t *dst = ((uint8_t *)a); uint8_t c = (b); int count = (c); uin t32_t dummy0, dummy1, dummy2; __asm__ __volatile__ ( Notice that first there is a declaration of a variable c (uint8_t), then in the next statement there is a use of c. This use (which is intended to be of the formal parameter passed to memset_arm9 is instead interpreted as the newly declared variable c (the uint8 one). Compiling your testcase with -Wshadow gives: inl.c: In function 'memset_arm9': inl.c:66: warning: declaration of 'c' shadows a parameter inl.c:64: warning: shadowed declaration is here -- rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31693
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-10 14:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2007-04-25 6:24 [Bug inline-asm/31693] New: " siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2007-04-25 6:26 ` [Bug inline-asm/31693] " siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2007-04-25 6:28 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2007-05-31 20:01 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2008-05-13 12:33 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2008-09-03 9:54 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2009-02-10 14:36 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2009-02-10 15:12 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2009-02-10 15:21 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20090210143621.6207.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).