* [Bug c++/28274] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-06 3:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-06 3:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-06 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Known to fail| |4.1.1
Known to work|3.3.6 |3.3.6 3.4.0
Summary|Redeclaration with extra |[4.1/4.2 Regression]
|default argument doesn't |Redeclaration with extra
|work |default argument doesn't
| |work
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-06 3:06 ` [Bug c++/28274] [4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-06 3:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-17 3:08 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-06 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 03:08 -------
Confirmed, at least a 4.1/4.2 regression, I cannot test 4.0.x but I do know
that "4.1.0 20051026" worked and so did "4.0.0 20050225".
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-07-06 03:08:07
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-06 3:06 ` [Bug c++/28274] [4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-06 3:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-17 3:08 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-27 20:31 ` [Bug c++/28274] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-17 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-17 3:08 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-27 20:31 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-28 11:35 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-27 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 20:31 -------
This was caused by my patch for PR 16829.
I'll take care of it.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords| |monitored
Known to fail|4.1.1 |3.4.6 4.0.3 4.1.0 4.1.1
| |4.2.0
Known to work|3.3.6 3.4.0 |3.3.6 3.4.0 3.4.5 4.0.2
Summary|[4.1/4.2 Regression] |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|Redeclaration with extra |Redeclaration with extra
|default argument doesn't |default argument doesn't
|work |work
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-27 20:31 ` [Bug c++/28274] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-28 11:35 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-08-03 2:31 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-07-28 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-07-28 11:35 -------
Subject: Bug number PR c++/28274
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg01189.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-28 11:35 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2006-08-03 2:31 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-03 2:34 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-03 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-03 02:30 -------
Subject: Bug 28274
Author: reichelt
Date: Thu Aug 3 02:30:49 2006
New Revision: 115893
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115893
Log:
PR c++/28274
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): Call check_default_args here.
(start_preparsed_function): Do not call check_default_args.
* name-lookup.c (pushdecl_maybe_friend): Only call
check_default_args if duplicate_decls got bypassed.
* g++.dg/other/default5.C: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/default5.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c
trunk/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-03 2:31 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-03 2:34 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-03 2:41 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-03 2:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-03 02:34 -------
Subject: Bug 28274
Author: reichelt
Date: Thu Aug 3 02:34:14 2006
New Revision: 115894
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115894
Log:
PR c++/28274
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): Call check_default_args here.
(start_preparsed_function): Do not call check_default_args.
* name-lookup.c (pushdecl_maybe_friend): Only call
check_default_args if duplicate_decls got bypassed.
* g++.dg/other/default5.C: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/default5.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/decl.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-03 2:34 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-03 2:41 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-03 3:10 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-03 2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-03 02:41 -------
Subject: Bug 28274
Author: reichelt
Date: Thu Aug 3 02:41:33 2006
New Revision: 115895
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115895
Log:
PR c++/28274
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): Call check_default_args here.
(start_preparsed_function): Do not call check_default_args.
* name-lookup.c (pushdecl_maybe_friend): Only call
check_default_args if duplicate_decls got bypassed.
* g++.dg/other/default5.C: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/default5.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cp/decl.c
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-03 2:41 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-03 3:10 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-22 8:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-03 3:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-03 03:10 -------
Fixed on mainline, 4.1 branch, and 4.0 branch.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Known to fail|3.4.6 4.0.3 4.1.0 4.1.1 |3.4.6 4.0.3 4.1.0 4.1.1
|4.2.0 |
Known to work|3.3.6 3.4.0 3.4.5 4.0.2 |3.3.6 3.4.0 3.4.5 4.0.2
| |4.0.4 4.1.2 4.2.0
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-03 3:10 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-22 8:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-11 21:29 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-22 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-22 08:04 -------
*** Bug 29177 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |greifel at megatop200 dot
| |com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-22 8:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-11 21:29 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-11 21:31 ` [Bug c++/28274] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-11 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-11 21:28 -------
This is still broken inside extern "C":
extern "C" {
void foo (int i, int j = 6);
void foo (int i = 4, int j);
}
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-11 21:29 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-11 21:31 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-25 10:33 ` andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-11 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-11 21:31 -------
The extern "C" testcase passed under the 3.2 compiler; marking as regression.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work|3.3.6 3.4.0 3.4.5 4.0.2 |3.3.6 3.4.0 3.4.5 4.0.2
|4.0.4 4.1.2 4.2.0 |4.0.4 4.1.2
Priority|P1 |P2
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] |[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
|Redeclaration with extra |Redeclaration with extra
|default argument doesn't |default argument doesn't
|work |work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-11 21:31 ` [Bug c++/28274] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-25 10:33 ` andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de
2009-02-25 21:00 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de @ 2009-02-25 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2009-02-25 10:33 -------
The target milestone 4.0.4 is wrong
--
andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-25 10:33 ` andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de
@ 2009-02-25 21:00 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-24 22:26 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-25 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-25 21:00 -------
The culprit is in the function pushdecl_maybe_friend:
Functions declared extern "C" bypass the usual mechanism, because
duplicate_decls isn't called for them (see lines 727ff):
else if ((DECL_EXTERN_C_FUNCTION_P (x)
|| DECL_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_P (x))
&& is_overloaded_fn (t))
/* Don't do anything just yet. */;
else if (t == wchar_decl_node)
[...snip...]
else
{
tree olddecl = duplicate_decls (x, t, is_friend);
Later only the binding for such functions is compared, which doesn't
take default parameters into account (see line 778ff):
if ((TREE_CODE (x) == FUNCTION_DECL)
&& DECL_EXTERN_C_P (x)
/* We should ignore declarations happening in system headers. */
&& !DECL_IN_SYSTEM_HEADER (x))
{
cxx_binding *function_binding =
lookup_extern_c_fun_binding_in_all_ns (x);
if (function_binding
&& !DECL_IN_SYSTEM_HEADER (function_binding->value))
{
tree previous = function_binding->value;
/* In case either x or previous is declared to throw an
exception,
make sure both exception specifications are equal. */
if (decls_match (x, previous))
[...snip...]
}
}
if (TREE_CODE (x) == FUNCTION_DECL || DECL_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_P (x))
check_default_args (x);
I'm not sure how to proceed from here, so unassigning.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
AssignedTo|reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org |dot org
Status|REOPENED |NEW
Known to fail|3.4.6 4.0.3 4.1.0 4.1.1 |3.4.6 4.0.3 4.1.0 4.2.0
| |4.3.0
Known to work|3.3.6 3.4.0 3.4.5 4.0.2 |3.3.6 3.4.0 3.4.5 4.0.0
|4.0.4 4.1.2 |4.0.1 4.0.2
Target Milestone|4.0.4 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-25 21:00 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-24 22:26 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-24 22:27 ` [Bug c++/28274] [4.2/4.3 " jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-24 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-24 22:26 -------
Subject: Bug 28274
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 24 22:26:21 2009
New Revision: 145042
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145042
Log:
PR c++/28274
* name-lookup.c (pushdecl_maybe_friend): Check default args later.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/defarg14.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-24 22:26 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-24 22:27 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 19:40 ` [Bug c++/28274] [4.3 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-24 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-24 22:27 -------
Fixed for 4.4.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] |[4.2/4.3 Regression]
|Redeclaration with extra |Redeclaration with extra
|default argument doesn't |default argument doesn't
|work |work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.3 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-24 22:27 ` [Bug c++/28274] [4.2/4.3 " jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-31 19:40 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 19:39 -------
Closing 4.2 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2/4.3 Regression] |[4.3 Regression]
|Redeclaration with extra |Redeclaration with extra
|default argument doesn't |default argument doesn't
|work |work
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.3 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-31 19:40 ` [Bug c++/28274] [4.3 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28274] [4.3 Regression] Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work
2006-07-05 18:29 [Bug c++/28274] New: Redeclaration with extra default argument doesn't work amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-22 18:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:11 -------
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28274
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread