From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27536 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2009 19:07:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 27503 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2009 19:07:47 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090212190747.27502.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/39152] [4.4 regression] Revision 144098 breaks 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "bonzini at gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg01131.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #15 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-12 19:07 ------- Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] Revision 144098 breaks 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 The patch is obviously okay, but it seems weird that this is accepted. I must be missing something on peephole2... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39152