From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15567 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2009 10:30:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 15204 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2009 10:30:10 -0000 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090218103010.15203.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/39226] [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg01586.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-02-18 10:30 ------- Subject: Re: New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE This is mostly likely due to my no micro code patch. I see what causes it tommorow. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2009, at 11:55 PM, "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" wrote: > /* { dg-do compile } */ > /* { dg-options "-O2" } */ > /* { dg-options "-O2 -mtune=cell -mminimal-toc" { target { powerpc*- > *-* && lp64 > } } } */ > > struct A > { > char *a; > unsigned int b : 1; > unsigned int c : 31; > }; > > struct B > { > struct A *d; > }; > > void > foo (struct B *x, unsigned long y) > { > if (x->d[y].c) > return; > if (x->d[y].b) > x->d[y].a = 0; > } > > ICEs with -m64 -O2 -mtune=cell -mminimal-toc, as elimination offsets > change. > > > -- > Summary: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert > (verify_initial_elim_offsets > ()); ICE > Product: gcc > Version: 4.4.0 > Status: UNCONFIRMED > Keywords: ice-on-valid-code > Severity: normal > Priority: P3 > Component: target > AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org > ReportedBy: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org > GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226 > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226