From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32356 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2009 21:50:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 32296 invoked by uid 48); 19 Feb 2009 21:50:29 -0000 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090219215029.32295.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/39252] Request new feature __builtin_not_reached(); In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg01763.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-19 21:50 ------- Why again is __builtin_trap not useful for this purpose? You mention about "assembly constructs" but why not instead implement those as builtins instead of providing something which really can be abused? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Target Milestone|4.5.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39252