[Bug testsuite/39265] New: [miro] revision 144368 - "make -i check" autogen "fixinclude test FAILURES"

[Bug testsuite/39265] New: [miro] revision 144368 - "make -i check" autogen "fixinclude test FAILURES"

[rob1weld at aol dot com]

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #38727 +++

The autogen program finds fixinclude test failures in miro :

# gmake -i check
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/share/src/miro_build/fixincludes'
autogen -T ../../miro/fixincludes/check.tpl ../../miro/fixincludes/inclhack.def
/bin/sh ./check.sh ../../miro/fixincludes/tests/base
Fixed:  testing.h
Fixed:  testing.h
Fixed:  ansi/math.h
Fixed:  ansi/stdlib.h
...
Fixed:  pixrect/memvar.h
sed: command garbled: /define[  ]\+PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER[   ]*\\/,+1s/{ {
0, } }/{ { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 } }/
Fixed:  regex.h
...
Fixed:  Xm/Traversal.h
sys/stat.h /usr/share/src/miro/fixincludes/tests/base/sys/stat.h differ: char
432, line 18
*** sys/stat.h  Sun Feb 22 04:17:27 2009
--- /usr/share/src/miro/fixincludes/tests/base/sys/stat.h       Sat Feb 21
18:06:34 2009
***************
*** 15,23 ****


  #if defined( GLIBC_C99_INLINE_2_CHECK )
- extern int fstat64 (int __fd, struct stat64 *__buf) __THROW __nonnull ((2));
  #ifdef __GNUC_GNU_INLINE__
  extern
  #endif
  __inline__ int
  __NTH (fstat64 (int __fd, struct stat64 *__statbuf))
--- 15,26 ----


  #if defined( GLIBC_C99_INLINE_2_CHECK )
  #ifdef __GNUC_GNU_INLINE__
  extern
+ #endif
+ __inline__ int fstat64 (int __fd, struct stat64 *__buf) __THROW __nonnull
((2));
+ #ifdef __GNUC_GNU_INLINE__
+ extern
  #endif
  __inline__ int
  __NTH (fstat64 (int __fd, struct stat64 *__statbuf))
Missing header fix:  pthread.h

There were fixinclude test FAILURES
gmake[2]: [check] Error 1 (ignored)
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/share/src/miro_build/fixincludes'
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/share/src/miro_build/gcc'
...

Thanks,
Rob


-- 
           Summary: [miro] revision 144368 - "make -i check" autogen
                    "fixinclude test FAILURES"
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: testsuite
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
 GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
  GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11
GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.11


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39265

[Bug testsuite/39265] [miro] revision 144368 - "make -i check" autogen "fixinclude test FAILURES"

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-22 12:18 -------
What is the miro branch?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39265

[Bug testsuite/39265] [miro] revision 144368 - "make -i check" autogen "fixinclude test FAILURES"

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-22 12:21 -------
"creating MIRO (Mudflap Improved with Referent Objects) branch"

Seb?


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |spop at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39265

[Bug testsuite/39265] [miro] revision 144368 - "make -i check" autogen "fixinclude test FAILURES"

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-22 12:23 -------
miro branch was created but never touched so invalid.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39265

[Bug web/39265] [miro] revision 144368 - "make -i check" autogen "fixinclude test FAILURES"

[rob1weld at aol dot com]

------- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com  2009-02-22 12:54 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/MIRO
svn co svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/miro miro


Please read: http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html#devbranches

The "miro branch" is listed under "Active Development Branches".


Lets go with this Branch needs it's web pages fixed.

Re-open as "web" (and no more Bug Reports about 'miro').

Rob


-- 

rob1weld at aol dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
          Component|testsuite                   |web
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39265

[Bug web/39265] [miro] branch listed as active development branch appears to be dead

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-22 12:59 -------
Indeed.

But Rob, Pinski has a point: There really are better things to spend your time
on than building development branches.  Such branches are often highly
experimental or very unstable, so bugs are not usually tracked in bugzilla but
in the branch maintainer's head or email box.  We only track bugs on branches
for some of the higher-profile branches that are more-or-less stable and close
to being merged (like the alias-improvements branch, or LTO).


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-02-22 12:59:32
               date|                            |
            Summary|[miro] revision 144368 -    |[miro] branch listed as
                   |"make -i check" autogen     |active development branch
                   |"fixinclude test FAILURES"  |appears to be dead


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39265

[Bug web/39265] [miro] branch listed as active development branch appears to be dead

[spop at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-22 15:03 -------
MIRO is an inactive development branch.  I will fix the svn.html page.


-- 

spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39265

[Bug web/39265] [miro] branch listed as active development branch appears to be dead

[rob1weld at aol dot com]

------- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com  2009-02-22 15:12 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> MIRO is an inactive development branch.  I will fix the svn.html page.

Thanks, that is all that is needed.

Rob


BTW: I was only going to run quickly through the code and
check that the 'New and Improved' mudflaps worked on Solaris
(seems to be OK so far). 

Since it was listed as "Active" and seems "Completed" (finished)
I though it might be on the list for merging - so as the 
"OpenSolaris 2009.06 guy" (and one of the few submitting Testsuite 
Results) I thought I would do my part to help.

I've received flames in other threads about this, very unneccesary.

Don't invite people to help ( see http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html#devbranches
_before_ it is changed) and then get annoyed that the page they
read is wrong (and it is their fault).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39265