From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23014 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2009 22:48:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 22993 invoked by uid 48); 23 Feb 2009 22:48:35 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090223224835.22992.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/39283] volatile data types ignore __attribute__ ((__aligned ...)) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg02057.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-23 22:48 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > So the cris problem with 1 vs 4 might be a different issue but the C front-end > does something incorrectly anyways. I was assuming it's the same basic problem, if nothing else that assumption simplified bug-reporting. :) But sure, middle-end instead of target is then more consistent. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39283