From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30515 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2009 00:20:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 30486 invoked by uid 48); 3 Mar 2009 00:20:29 -0000 Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090303002029.30485.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/39333] gcc 4.3.3 miscompiles when -finline-small-functions is used In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "galtgendo at o2 dot pl" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2009-03-03 00:20 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > But that just enables more inlining. The problem is most likely somewhere > else. > If so, why does '-O2' fail and '-O2 -fno-inline-small-functions' work ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333