public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/39254] [4.4 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-trap-1.c ICEs on powerpc-apple-darwin9
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090303094037.24651.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-39254-11113@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #11 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-03 09:40 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Mike, as far as I can tell, you originally (in 1997) added the code to
> rs6000.md which is now in rs6000.c:rs6000_emit_move and emits a USE
> for SYMBOL_REFS that are the source of a move. (Search for
> "Emit a USE operation").
I have tried to #ifdef 0 this code in rs6000_emit_move, and a regression
test on gcc40 (powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu) shows only two differences,
i.e.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-trap-1.c compilation, -O2 (internal
compile
r error)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-trap-1.c compilation, -Os (internal
compile
r error)
from the baseline went away.
I've used revision 144485 for my baseline, and after determining that
a standard bootstrap did not work (probably a 32/64 bit ABI problem,
I didn't think it was worth the trouble to hand-bootstrap to 64 bit
considering this is probably not the OS we really need testing)
I built / tested with:
( make all-gcc all-target-libgcc all-target-libobjc all-target-libstdc++-v3
all-target-libgfortran;make check) > make.out 2>&1 &
baseline summaries:
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 52951
# of unexpected failures 23
# of expected failures 204
# of unresolved testcases 2
# of unsupported tests 615
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 19046
# of expected failures 140
# of unsupported tests 133
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes 29054
# of expected failures 11
# of unsupported tests 183
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 5828
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unexpected successes 4
# of expected failures 80
# of unsupported tests 333
Patched summary:
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 52955
# of unexpected failures 21
# of expected failures 204
# of unsupported tests 615
; identical as baseline above for the other testsuites.
I think this should be tested on a power or powerpc AIX target.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39254
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-03 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-20 20:50 [Bug c/39254] New: " howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-02-20 20:53 ` [Bug middle-end/39254] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-20 22:47 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2009-02-21 0:24 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-02-21 0:59 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-02-21 1:16 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2009-02-21 9:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-02-21 12:31 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-02-24 13:16 ` [Bug middle-end/39254] [4.4 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-26 9:10 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-02-28 16:30 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-03 9:40 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2009-03-04 12:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-19 17:01 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-21 16:02 ` [Bug middle-end/39254] [4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-26 16:52 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-15 23:06 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-17 4:20 ` [Bug target/39254] " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-17 4:28 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-17 4:38 ` [Bug target/39254] [4.4 " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-17 11:57 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-07-22 10:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-15 12:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-21 13:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-21 23:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-23 19:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-23 19:55 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-23 20:33 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-24 14:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-26 13:38 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-27 18:56 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-27 19:03 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-21 15:16 ` gcc at breakpoint dot cc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090303094037.24651.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).