public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/39254] [4.4 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-trap-1.c ICEs on powerpc-apple-darwin9
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090303094037.24651.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-39254-11113@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #11 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-03 09:40 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Mike, as far as I can tell, you originally (in 1997) added the code to
> rs6000.md which is now in rs6000.c:rs6000_emit_move and emits a USE
> for SYMBOL_REFS that are the source of a move.  (Search for
> "Emit a USE operation").

I have tried to #ifdef 0 this code in rs6000_emit_move, and a regression
test on gcc40 (powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu) shows only two differences,
i.e.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-trap-1.c compilation,  -O2  (internal
compile
r error)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-trap-1.c compilation,  -Os  (internal
compile
r error)
from the baseline went away.

I've used revision 144485 for my baseline, and after determining that
a standard bootstrap did not work (probably a 32/64 bit ABI problem,
I didn't think it was worth the trouble to hand-bootstrap to 64 bit
considering this is probably not the OS we really need testing)
I built / tested with:
( make all-gcc all-target-libgcc all-target-libobjc all-target-libstdc++-v3
all-target-libgfortran;make check) > make.out 2>&1 &
baseline summaries:
                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            52951
# of unexpected failures        23
# of expected failures          204
# of unresolved testcases       2
# of unsupported tests          615
                === g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            19046
# of expected failures          140
# of unsupported tests          133
                === gfortran Summary ===

# of expected passes            29054
# of expected failures          11
# of unsupported tests          183
                === libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            5828
# of unexpected failures        1
# of unexpected successes       4
# of expected failures          80
# of unsupported tests          333

Patched summary:
                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            52955
# of unexpected failures        21
# of expected failures          204
# of unsupported tests          615
; identical as baseline above for the other testsuites.

I think this should be tested on a power or powerpc AIX target.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39254


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-03  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-20 20:50 [Bug c/39254] New: " howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-02-20 20:53 ` [Bug middle-end/39254] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-20 22:47 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2009-02-21  0:24 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-02-21  0:59 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-02-21  1:16 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2009-02-21  9:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-02-21 12:31 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-02-24 13:16 ` [Bug middle-end/39254] [4.4 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-26  9:10 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-02-28 16:30 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-03  9:40 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2009-03-04 12:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-19 17:01 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-21 16:02 ` [Bug middle-end/39254] [4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-26 16:52 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-15 23:06 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-17  4:20 ` [Bug target/39254] " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-17  4:28 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-17  4:38 ` [Bug target/39254] [4.4 " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-17 11:57 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-07-22 10:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-15 12:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-21 13:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-21 23:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-23 19:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-23 19:55 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-23 20:33 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-24 14:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-26 13:38 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-03-27 18:56 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-27 19:03 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-21 15:16 ` gcc at breakpoint dot cc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090303094037.24651.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).