From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11322 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2009 11:35:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 11265 invoked by uid 48); 11 Mar 2009 11:35:16 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090311113516.11264.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/36834] structure return ABI for windows targets differs from native MSVC In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rogerpack2005 at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00728.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from rogerpack2005 at gmail dot com 2009-03-11 11:35 ------- I'd be willing to offer a small bounty for this one. Maybe $50 for an accepted patch that handles both the caller and callee sides? The problem seems to be common [1]. Thanks! -=r [1] http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:e7XCjhLwHacJ:luabinaries.luaforge.net/manual.html+http://luabinaries.luaforge.net/manual.html%23LuaBinariesCompatible&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=opera is it the same bug [they mention incompats when passing CRT objects among libraries]? dunno. -- rogerpack2005 at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rogerpack2005 at gmail dot | |com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834