From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-278240-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29277 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2009 07:46:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 28706 invoked by uid 48); 17 Mar 2009 07:46:14 -0000
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20090317074614.28705.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-39471-12292@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug debug/39471] DW_TAG_imported_module should be used (not DW_TAG_imported_declaration)
In-Reply-To: <bug-39471-12292@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg01147.txt.bz2



------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-17 07:46 -------
Created an attachment (id=17471)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17471&action=view)
gcc44-pr39471.patch

So this patch instead?  C++ will never need non-NULL DECL_NAME on
IMPORTED_DECL,
as it doesn't have the ability to rename imports like Fortran does.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39471