public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/39494] New: Bad assembly when derived class has same name as virtual method
@ 2009-03-18 14:31 james dot ashley at gmail dot com
2009-03-18 14:33 ` [Bug c++/39494] " james dot ashley at gmail dot com
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: james dot ashley at gmail dot com @ 2009-03-18 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
I'm sorry...I don't know what "triplet" means. There was nothing about it in
the FAQ. I took my best guess.
g++ -v --version prints
g++ (Debian 4.3.2-1.1) 4.3.2
cat /proc/version prints
Linux version 2.6.26-1-686 (Debian 2.6.26-13) (waldi@debian.org) (gcc version
4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-24)) #1 SMP Sat Jan 10 18:29:31 UTC
2009
I'm using the stock g++ build that came from Debian, whatever compiler options
they use.
After I traced it down, the problem turned out to be fairly simple [to
produce].
In what looks [to me] like the vtable for the constructor of the derived class,
the compiler's appending *INTERNAL*.
Since I don't know whether there's a page 2,
The command gcc -c -Wall compilerBug.cpp
produces the output
/tmp/ccHFsjIR.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccHFsjIR.s:68: Warning: missing operand; zero assumed
/tmp/ccHFsjIR.s:68: Error: undefined symbol `INTERNAL' in operation
The line it's complaining about looks like this:
.long _ZN7DerivedC1Ev *INTERNAL*
I've boiled the precompiled source file down to
# 1 "compilerBug.cpp"
# 1 "<built-in>"
# 1 "<command-line>"
# 1 "compilerBug.cpp"
class Base
{
public:
virtual void Derived() = 0;
};
class Derived : public Base
{
public:
Derived();
};
Derived::Derived()
: Base()
{}
(Everything else I tried to delete let the compiler optimize everything away).
I have no idea what the standard says about how this should actually work (or
not). Compiler error about conflicting symbols? Warning about "this is stupid,
and you probably don't want to do it"? Or just go ahead and magically work?
Especially since the work-around's as easy as renaming either the function or
the derived class.
I just know that the FAQ says that invalid assembly output is a bug, so here we
go.
Thanks *so* much for committing time and effort to work on the compiler. It
really is the heart and soul of the entire free software movement.
--
Summary: Bad assembly when derived class has same name as virtual
method
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: james dot ashley at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: 4.3.2
GCC host triplet: 2.6.26-13
GCC target triplet: 2.6.26-13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39494
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/39494] Bad assembly when derived class has same name as virtual method
2009-03-18 14:31 [Bug c++/39494] New: Bad assembly when derived class has same name as virtual method james dot ashley at gmail dot com
@ 2009-03-18 14:33 ` james dot ashley at gmail dot com
2009-03-18 14:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-18 16:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: james dot ashley at gmail dot com @ 2009-03-18 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from james dot ashley at gmail dot com 2009-03-18 14:33 -------
Created an attachment (id=17487)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17487&action=view)
Smallest example I could come up with
Sorry, like I said in the description, I wasn't sure I'd have a chance to do
this
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39494
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/39494] Bad assembly when derived class has same name as virtual method
2009-03-18 14:31 [Bug c++/39494] New: Bad assembly when derived class has same name as virtual method james dot ashley at gmail dot com
2009-03-18 14:33 ` [Bug c++/39494] " james dot ashley at gmail dot com
@ 2009-03-18 14:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-18 16:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-18 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-18 14:56 -------
This means that a reference to an abstract function is emitted which should
have been cloned. EDG accepts this testcase so I qualify this as wrong-code
bug.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |rejects-valid, wrong-code
Known to fail| |3.3.6 4.0.0 4.3.3 4.4.0
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-03-18 14:56:55
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39494
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/39494] Bad assembly when derived class has same name as virtual method
2009-03-18 14:31 [Bug c++/39494] New: Bad assembly when derived class has same name as virtual method james dot ashley at gmail dot com
2009-03-18 14:33 ` [Bug c++/39494] " james dot ashley at gmail dot com
2009-03-18 14:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-18 16:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-03-18 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-18 16:16 -------
Icc ia32 generates:
_ZTV7Derived:
.type _ZTV7Derived,@object
.size _ZTV7Derived,12
.long 0
.long _ZTI7Derived
.long __cxa_pure_virtual
Gcc generates:
.size _ZTV7Derived, 24
_ZTV7Derived:
.long 0
.long _ZTI7Derived
.long __cxa_pure_virtual
.long _ZN7DerivedC1Ev *INTERNAL*
.long _ZN7DerivedC2Ev
.long _ZN7DerivedC1Ev
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39494
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/39494] Bad assembly when derived class has same name as virtual method
[not found] <bug-39494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2014-06-24 11:53 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2014-06-24 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39494
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
Known to work| |4.10.0, 4.8.0, 4.9.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to fail| |
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Fixed long time ago.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-24 11:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-18 14:31 [Bug c++/39494] New: Bad assembly when derived class has same name as virtual method james dot ashley at gmail dot com
2009-03-18 14:33 ` [Bug c++/39494] " james dot ashley at gmail dot com
2009-03-18 14:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-18 16:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
[not found] <bug-39494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-06-24 11:53 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).