public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors.
@ 2009-03-18 9:43 n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-18 9:47 ` [Bug fortran/39489] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (13 more replies)
0 siblings, 14 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt @ 2009-03-18 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The compilation with gfortran 4.3 on i486 processors seems to produces a module
with an error. Further include of that module produces an overflow message and
aborts the compilation.
The same module compiles without problems with gfortran 4.3.2 on x86_64
processors.
I'm not sure what further information I should submit...
--
Summary: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
GCC build triplet: Linux, i486
GCC host triplet: Linux, i486
GCC target triplet: Linux, i486
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors.
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
@ 2009-03-18 9:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-03-18 10:01 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2009-03-18 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-03-18 09:46 -------
> I'm not sure what further information I should submit...
Submit a reduced test case showing the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors.
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-18 9:47 ` [Bug fortran/39489] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2009-03-18 10:01 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-18 15:07 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-18 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-18 10:01 -------
It's hard to tell without a code example, really ...
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Severity|blocker |normal
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
GCC build triplet|Linux, i486 |
GCC host triplet|Linux, i486 |
GCC target triplet|Linux, i486 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors.
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-18 9:47 ` [Bug fortran/39489] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-03-18 10:01 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-18 15:07 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-18 15:08 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt @ 2009-03-18 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt 2009-03-18 15:06 -------
Created an attachment (id=17488)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17488&action=view)
Streamlined module files reproducing the error
See the README for compilation instructions
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors.
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-18 15:07 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
@ 2009-03-18 15:08 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-18 15:44 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt @ 2009-03-18 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt 2009-03-18 15:08 -------
The code was tested only with gfortran 4.3.2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors.
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-18 15:08 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
@ 2009-03-18 15:44 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-03-18 16:35 ` [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 Regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2009-03-18 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-03-18 15:44 -------
On powerpc-apple-darwin9 with gfortran 4.3.3 (with or without -m64) I get:
[karma] Downloads/gftest% gfortran -c MpkBase.f95
MpkBase.f95:831.17:
END MODULE pkBase
1
Internal Error at (1):
gfc_code2string(): Bad code
MpkBase.f95 compiles with gfortran from trunk. However I got many errors with
MpkData.f95:
MpkData.f95:598.70:
IF( p_energy%value == 0 ) p_energy%value = Species(j)%p_energy
1
Error: 'p_energy' at (1) is not a member of the 'particle' structure
MpkData.f95:680.60:
initial_conc%value, mpolar, data_file, gains, losses )
1
Error: Too many components in structure constructor at (1)!
...
MpkData.f95:93.30:
call pkReadData( UI, FMT, IOError(3) )
1
Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument 'iostat'
(1/3) at (1)
MpkData.f95:95.32:
call pkReadData( UI, iostat=IOError(3) )
1
Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument 'iostat'
(1/3) at (1)
Too many errors to have chance to fix them right now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 Regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-18 15:44 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2009-03-18 16:35 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-18 17:45 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-18 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-18 16:35 -------
With 4.3.4 (20090318) I get:
$> gfortran-4.3 -o test MpkCommon.f95 MpkBase.f95 MpkData.f95 teste.f95
MpkBase.f95:831.17:
END MODULE pkBase
1
Internal Error at (1):
write_atom(): Writing negative integer
Fatal Error: Reading module pkbase at line 358 column 47: Expected integer
Fatal Error: Reading module pkbase at line 358 column 47: Expected integer
but 4.2 (20090203) and 4.4 (20090317, to be released soonish) give:
$> gfortran-svn -o test MpkCommon.f95 MpkBase.f95 MpkData.f95 teste.f95
MpkData.f95:598.70:
IF( p_energy%value == 0 ) p_energy%value = Species(j)%p_energy
1
Error: 'p_energy' at (1) is not a member of the 'particle' structure
MpkData.f95:680.60:
initial_conc%value, mpolar, data_file, gains, losses )
1
Error: Too many components in structure constructor at (1)!
MpkData.f95:735.34:
ELSE IF (Species(i)%constant) THEN
1
Error: 'constant' at (1) is not a member of the 'particle' structure
MpkData.f95:739.33:
ELSE IF( Species(i)%cascade ) THEN
1
Error: 'cascade' at (1) is not a member of the 'particle' structure
MpkData.f95:774.29:
IF (Species(i)%constant) THEN
1
Error: 'constant' at (1) is not a member of the 'particle' structure
MpkData.f95:777.36:
Species(i)%name /= 'e') THEN
1
Error: Unexpected ELSE IF statement at (1)
MpkData.f95:783.43:
ELSE IF( Species(i)%name == 'e') THEN
1
Error: Unexpected ELSE IF statement at (1)
MpkData.f95:785.58:
ELSE IF( INDEX(Species(i)%name, 'photon') /= 0) THEN
1
Error: Unexpected ELSE IF statement at (1)
MpkData.f95:787.33:
ELSE IF( Species(i)%cascade) THEN
1
Error: 'cascade' at (1) is not a member of the 'particle' structure
MpkData.f95:790.65:
( Species(i)%v == -1 .and. Species(i)%energy > 0 ) ) THEN
1
Error: Unexpected ELSE IF statement at (1)
MpkData.f95:792.47:
ELSE ! .not. Species(i)%constant
1
Error: Unexpected ELSE statement at (1)
MpkData.f95:794.9:
END IF
1
Error: Expecting END DO statement at (1)
MpkData.f95:2061.55:
mask=Kreac(i)%Nreactants(:)>0) )%p_energy ) &
1
Error: 'p_energy' at (1) is not a member of the 'particle' structure
MpkData.f95:2091.54:
mask=Kreac(i)%Nproducts(:)>0) )%p_energy ) + &
1
Error: 'p_energy' at (1) is not a member of the 'particle' structure
MpkData.f95:2112.51:
mask=Kreac(i)%Nproducts(:)>0))%p_energy ) + &
1
Error: 'p_energy' at (1) is not a member of the 'particle' structure
MpkData.f95:2394.75:
Index = i; name = Species(i)%name; constant = Species(i)%constant
1
Error: 'constant' at (1) is not a member of the 'particle' structure
MpkData.f95:2395.38:
cascade = Species(i)%cascade; charge = Species(i)%charge
1
Error: 'cascade' at (1) is not a member of the 'particle' structure
MpkData.f95:2397.40:
p_energy = Species(i)%p_energy; energy = Species(i)%energy
1
Error: 'p_energy' at (1) is not a member of the 'particle' structure
MpkData.f95:93.30:
call pkReadData( UI, FMT, IOError(3) )
1
Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument 'iostat'
(1/3) at (1)
MpkData.f95:95.32:
call pkReadData( UI, iostat=IOError(3) )
1
Warning: Actual argument contains too few elements for dummy argument 'iostat'
(1/3) at (1)
As the error does not occur in trunk, I believe it is unlikely that it will be
fixed in the branch.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |4.3.4
Known to work| |4.2.5 4.4.0
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-03-18 16:35:20
date| |
Summary|Error in module with |[4.3 Regression]
|gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit |write_atom(): Writing
|processors. |negative integer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 Regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-18 16:35 ` [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 Regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-18 17:45 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-18 17:48 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt @ 2009-03-18 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt 2009-03-18 17:44 -------
Created an attachment (id=17489)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17489&action=view)
Streamlined module files reproducing the error (2)
Test files with a corrected version of MpkData.f95.
With gfortran 4.3.2 in i486 both MpkCommon.f95 and MpkBase.f95 files compile
without errors but the instruction "gfortran -c MpkData.f95" produces the
following error message:
Fatal Error: Reading module pkbase at line 22 column 20: Integer overflow
--
n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #17488|0 |1
is obsolete| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 Regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-18 17:45 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
@ 2009-03-18 17:48 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-19 8:24 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt @ 2009-03-18 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt 2009-03-18 17:48 -------
The code compiles with gfortran 4.2 without problems.
--
n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |n dot pinhao at netvisao dot
| |pt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 Regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-18 17:48 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
@ 2009-03-19 8:24 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-31 15:59 ` [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 regression] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt @ 2009-03-19 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt 2009-03-19 08:24 -------
Created an attachment (id=17492)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17492&action=view)
Streamlined module files reproducing the error (2)
A file was missing on this test.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-19 8:24 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
@ 2009-03-31 15:59 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-22 13:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.3 only, regression] |[4.3 regression]
|write_atom(): Writing |write_atom(): Writing
|negative integer |negative integer
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-31 15:59 ` [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 regression] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-22 13:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-28 11:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-22 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 13:26 -------
Fortran. P4.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-22 13:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-28 11:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-12 22:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-05 9:07 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-28 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1078 bytes --]
------- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 11:46 -------
I cannot reproduce this with 4.3.4 20090428 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 138185],
however, valgrind shows
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x446764: (within
/gcc-4.3/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.3.4/f951)
by 0x4486FD: (within
/gcc-4.3/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.3.4/f951)
for MpkBase.f95 and MpkData.f95 and no such warning for MpkCommon.f95. In order
to pinpoint that problem, I need to build 4.3 with -g ...
* * *
Nuno Pinhão, you could consider updating to 4.4.0 instead which does not have
this problem and was recently released. (The 4.5 developer branch also works
fine.)
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-28 11:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-05-12 22:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-05 9:07 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-05-12 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 22:05 -------
Some more data:
==16952== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==16952== at 0x4470FC: write_atom (module.c:1339)
==16952== by 0x4472DD: mio_integer (module.c:1450)
==16952== by 0x447DAC: mio_typespec (module.c:1870)
==16952== by 0x449710: mio_symbol (module.c:3048)
That are lines such as:
mio_integer (&ts->is_c_interop);
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-05-12 22:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-07-05 9:07 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-07-05 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 09:07 -------
Works with newer branches (4.4 and 4.5). According to gfortran maintainers
meeting, will not be fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39489
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-05 9:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-18 9:43 [Bug fortran/39489] New: Error in module with gfortran 4.3 in 32 bit processors n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-18 9:47 ` [Bug fortran/39489] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-03-18 10:01 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-18 15:07 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-18 15:08 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-18 15:44 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-03-18 16:35 ` [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 Regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-18 17:45 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-18 17:48 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-19 8:24 ` n dot pinhao at netvisao dot pt
2009-03-31 15:59 ` [Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 regression] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-22 13:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-28 11:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-12 22:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-05 9:07 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).