public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/36834] structure return ABI for windows targets differs from native MSVC Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:04:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20090321010356.20462.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-36834-4066@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #8 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-03-21 01:03 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > The proposed patch works for plain C code, but also affects C++. Since > libstdc++ contains code that returns aggregates or calls code that does, An example, please. The patch only affects functions that return large (> 8 bytes) aggregates by value. Danny > -mms-aggregate-return will make the generated code incompatible with the C++ > library. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-21 1:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2008-07-15 9:28 [Bug target/36834] New: structure return ABI for windows targets differs from nbative MSVC dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-07-15 9:30 ` [Bug target/36834] " dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-07-17 8:16 ` [Bug target/36834] structure return ABI for windows targets differs from native MSVC dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-07-18 9:44 ` mattias at virtutech dot se 2009-03-11 11:35 ` rogerpack2005 at gmail dot com 2009-03-11 12:43 ` mattias at virtutech dot se 2009-03-14 21:14 ` rogerpack2005 at gmail dot com 2009-03-20 17:17 ` mattias at virtutech dot se 2009-03-21 1:04 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net [this message] 2009-03-21 16:46 ` mattias at virtutech dot se 2009-03-21 21:49 ` mattias at virtutech dot se 2009-03-23 22:10 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-06-24 12:05 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-36834-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2010-12-18 10:16 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-18 10:38 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-02-16 13:13 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20090321010356.20462.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).