* [Bug target/39226] [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-18 7:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-18 10:30 ` [Bug target/39226] New: " Andrew Thomas Pinski
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-18 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-18 7:56 ` [Bug target/39226] " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-18 10:30 ` Andrew Thomas Pinski
2009-02-18 10:30 ` [Bug target/39226] " pinskia at gmail dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Thomas Pinski @ 2009-02-18 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugzilla; +Cc: gcc-bugs
This is mostly likely due to my no micro code patch. I see what causes
it tommorow.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2009, at 11:55 PM, "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
> wrote:
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> /* { dg-options "-O2 -mtune=cell -mminimal-toc" { target { powerpc*-
> *-* && lp64
> } } } */
>
> struct A
> {
> char *a;
> unsigned int b : 1;
> unsigned int c : 31;
> };
>
> struct B
> {
> struct A *d;
> };
>
> void
> foo (struct B *x, unsigned long y)
> {
> if (x->d[y].c)
> return;
> if (x->d[y].b)
> x->d[y].a = 0;
> }
>
> ICEs with -m64 -O2 -mtune=cell -mminimal-toc, as elimination offsets
> change.
>
>
> --
> Summary: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert
> (verify_initial_elim_offsets
> ()); ICE
> Product: gcc
> Version: 4.4.0
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
> Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P3
> Component: target
> AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
> ReportedBy: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
> GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/39226] [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-18 7:56 ` [Bug target/39226] " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-18 10:30 ` [Bug target/39226] New: " Andrew Thomas Pinski
@ 2009-02-18 10:30 ` pinskia at gmail dot com
2009-02-18 12:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gmail dot com @ 2009-02-18 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-02-18 10:30 -------
Subject: Re: New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets
()); ICE
This is mostly likely due to my no micro code patch. I see what causes
it tommorow.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2009, at 11:55 PM, "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org"
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
> wrote:
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> /* { dg-options "-O2 -mtune=cell -mminimal-toc" { target { powerpc*-
> *-* && lp64
> } } } */
>
> struct A
> {
> char *a;
> unsigned int b : 1;
> unsigned int c : 31;
> };
>
> struct B
> {
> struct A *d;
> };
>
> void
> foo (struct B *x, unsigned long y)
> {
> if (x->d[y].c)
> return;
> if (x->d[y].b)
> x->d[y].a = 0;
> }
>
> ICEs with -m64 -O2 -mtune=cell -mminimal-toc, as elimination offsets
> change.
>
>
> --
> Summary: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert
> (verify_initial_elim_offsets
> ()); ICE
> Product: gcc
> Version: 4.4.0
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
> Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P3
> Component: target
> AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
> ReportedBy: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
> GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/39226] [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-18 10:30 ` [Bug target/39226] " pinskia at gmail dot com
@ 2009-02-18 12:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-18 19:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-18 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 12:28 -------
Yeah. Unlike anddi3_internal3_mc insn, anddi3_internal3_nomc only has an
alternative with "t" for the and64_2_operand that is not slightly disparaged
(?s), so for masks that match mask_operand or mask64_operand reload decides
to reload the DImode constant into register, which needs to be put into memory
and needs a TOC register etc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/39226] [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-18 12:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-18 19:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-18 19:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-18 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 19:34 -------
Hmm, for the PS3 toolchain, I think I just removed anddi3_internal3_mc.
Mine.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-02-18 19:34:53
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/39226] [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-18 19:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-18 19:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-18 19:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-18 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 19:40 -------
You mean anddi3_internal3_nomc, right? If so, I guess anddi3_internal2_nomc
should be removed too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/39226] [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-18 19:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-18 19:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-21 13:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-18 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 19:41 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> You mean anddi3_internal3_nomc, right? If so, I guess anddi3_internal2_nomc
> should be removed too.
I will have to look at what I did, I know I ran into a case where a constant
was being generated but really does not need to be generated ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/39226] [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-18 19:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-21 13:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-03 14:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-21 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/39226] [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-21 13:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-03 14:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-01 16:19 ` [Bug target/39226] [4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-03 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-03 14:25 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00148.html patch posted.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
| |patches/2009-
| |03/msg00148.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/39226] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-03 14:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-01 16:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-01 16:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-01 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-01 16:19 -------
Subject: Bug 39226
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 1 16:18:46 2009
New Revision: 145411
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145411
Log:
PR target/39226
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (andsi3_internal5_nomc,
anddi3_internal2_nomc, anddi3_internal3_nomc): Removed.
(booldi3_internal3): Use boolean_or_operator instead of
boolean_operator.
* gcc.dg/pr39226.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr39226.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/39226] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-01 16:19 ` [Bug target/39226] [4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-01 16:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-01 18:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-01 18:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-01 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-01 16:22 -------
Subject: Bug 39226
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 1 16:22:17 2009
New Revision: 145412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145412
Log:
PR target/39226
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (andsi3_internal5_nomc,
anddi3_internal2_nomc, anddi3_internal3_nomc): Removed.
(booldi3_internal3): Use boolean_or_operator instead of
boolean_operator.
* gcc.dg/pr39226.c: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr39226.c
- copied unchanged from r145411, trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr39226.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/39226] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-01 16:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-01 18:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-01 18:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-01 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-01 18:24 -------
Fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/39226] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE
2009-02-18 7:55 [Bug target/39226] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets ()); ICE jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-01 18:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-01 18:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-01 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-01 18:24 -------
So closing.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread