public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/39629] [4.5 Regression] Revision 145483 may have caused many failures
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090403221759.4024.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-39629-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-04-03 22:17 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > Created an attachment (id=17584)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17584&action=view) [edit]
> > > Fix a mistake in operator precedence in bits/random.h (_ShiftMin1)
> > > 
> > It still doesn't work for 32bit:
> > 
> > /export/gnu/import/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/shared_ptr/thread/default_weaktoshared.cc:93:
> 
> HJ, I'm sorry, I do not understand your english: you say "it *still* doesn't
> work", but this *specific* fail was not present in your initial list. Thus, is
> Ed's patchlet introducing one *additional* fail?
> 

"make check" was clean before revision 145483. Now I have many failures
on 32bit. Revision 145508 with patch in comment #3 still have many failures
on 32bit.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39629


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-03 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-03 15:55 [Bug libstdc++/39629] New: [4.5 Regression] Revision 145493 " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-03 16:00 ` [Bug libstdc++/39629] [4.5 Regression] Revision 145483 " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-03 17:27 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-04-03 17:49 ` 3dw4rd at verizon dot net
2009-04-03 19:45 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-03 19:48 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-03 21:41 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-04-03 22:18 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com [this message]
2009-04-03 22:43 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-04-04  0:48 ` 3dw4rd at verizon dot net
2009-04-04  0:50 ` 3dw4rd at verizon dot net
2009-04-04 23:09 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-05 22:42 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-05 22:43 ` [Bug libstdc++/39629] [4.5 Regression] Revision 145483 caused many libstdc++ failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-04-05 22:53 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-04-07 20:49 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-04-09 23:37 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-09 23:47 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090403221759.4024.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).