From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23355 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2009 06:07:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 23290 invoked by uid 48); 8 Apr 2009 06:06:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090408060649.23289.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/35466] Different assembly codes on 32bit and 64bit hosts In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00700.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-08 06:06 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Then we should fix this bug by requiring 64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT for x86 targets This is just the special case of GCC generating different code for the same target from different *hosts*; you'd have to require the same HOST_WIDE_INT for *all* hosts. Point: not a good *general* solution. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35466