From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17826 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2009 15:49:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 17769 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2009 15:49:39 -0000 Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090408154939.17768.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00744.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #18 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-08 15:49 ------- Subject: Re: -related issues (C99 issues) On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, hp at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Adding the libstdc++ regressions I've seen as a dependent, see PR39644 comment > #23. > (That is, the PR448 solution in progress relies on newlib providing the missing > INTPTR_MAX, INTPTR_MIN and UINTPTR_MAX which it doesn't do - yet.) Thanks for pointing this out - the intptr_t and uintptr_t types are optional, but the limits are required if the types are provided. I'll look at adding extra testcases verifying that GCC and the header agree on whether the limits are available. Someone should also fix newlib upstream to provide the limits and add appropriate fixincludes to GCC to fix older newlib headers. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448