From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-280624-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27218 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2009 20:20:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 27166 invoked by uid 48); 8 Apr 2009 20:20:22 -0000
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:20:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20090408202022.27160.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-39644-507@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/39644] [4.5 Regression]: cris-elf 17_intro/headers/c++200x/all.cc plus 3
In-Reply-To: <bug-39644-507@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00782.txt.bz2



------- Comment #28 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-04-08 20:20 -------
(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > Anyway, newlib patch sent,

Great, thanks.

> ...which BTW fixed the regressions, but not the new FAILs.  Hm.

Wait a minute, by new fails you mean those reported in libstdc++/39629? That is
completely different issue.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39644