public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rob1weld at aol dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/39625] [4.5 regression] Revision 145338 breaks ability to build Ada Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:27:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20090411022737.2513.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-39625-13830@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #27 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-11 02:27 ------- (In reply to comment #26) > << > We still have the issue that all Platforms accept the (usually non-default) > ./configure option "--enable-sjlj-exceptions" which leads to this Bug > on supported Platforms (and leads us down the path of breaking that Option). > >> > >No, platforms that do not use ZCX with GNAT use GNAT's front-end setjmp/longjmp > implementation, which is completely different from GCC's sjlj exception > (--enable-sjlj-exceptions related to GCC sjlj, not GNAT's fe setjmp/longjmp), > so once again, these platforms are not affected by this bug, only windows is. OK, multiple exception handling mechanisms. I became 'at odds with helpfulness' somewhere around comment #21. I only used that Option since OpenBSD Ports had used it (and without quoting OpenBSD source, and their license, they seem to use that option if Java is being built) otherwise I would have not included it. > Anyway, if "someone" (e.g. Richard Guenther, who apparently introduced it) > can fix this bug, that'd be great, I think this on the side discussion is > only generating noise and confusion at this point. I did "CC" him on this when I mentioned him in comment #7 but someone removed him from the "CC". In comment #14 I left open the possibility that someone might be paid by their Employer to fix this (or desire to fix _their_ OS) and I don't want to steal food from their mouth. Comment #25 (my last post) seemed valid as someone else had reported a workaround (and not a fix), that is all that tempted me to make this thread longer. I will refrain from further comment until either I have a "fix" _or_ I thank one of you for fixing this (Language that I do not use, on an OS that I do not use). I was thinking of the welfare of others (and gcc) too much, Rob -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39625
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-11 2:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2009-04-03 14:44 [Bug ada/39625] New: Revision 145488 - Ada - Unable to coalesce ssa_names 96 and 455 which are marked as MUST COALESCE rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-04 1:59 ` [Bug ada/39625] " rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-04 17:26 ` rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-04 17:45 ` [Bug ada/39625] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-05 0:49 ` rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 9:46 ` rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 17:08 ` rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 17:32 ` [Bug middle-end/39625] [4.5 regression] Revision 145338 breaks ability to build Ada rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 17:40 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-05 17:55 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-05 18:12 ` laurent at guerby dot net 2009-04-05 18:18 ` laurent at guerby dot net 2009-04-05 18:26 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-05 18:46 ` laurent at guerby dot net 2009-04-05 20:04 ` rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 20:10 ` rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 20:24 ` laurent at guerby dot net 2009-04-05 20:53 ` rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-05 21:43 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-05 22:18 ` rainer at emrich-ebersheim dot de 2009-04-07 4:00 ` rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-07 5:14 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09 3:51 ` rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-09 6:37 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09 8:07 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09 15:17 ` rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-04-09 15:41 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-11 2:27 ` rob1weld at aol dot com [this message] 2009-04-16 7:34 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 7:57 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 8:06 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2009-04-16 8:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 8:45 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2009-04-16 8:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 8:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 9:13 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 9:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 9:37 ` [Bug middle-end/39625] [4.5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 10:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 10:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-17 23:33 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20090411022737.2513.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).