From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15068 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2009 08:30:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 14760 invoked by uid 48); 14 Apr 2009 08:29:59 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090414082959.14759.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/39722] [cond-optab] worse code with bitfields on v850, mn10300, avr In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "bonzini at gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg01156.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-04-14 08:29 ------- Seems to be caused by a failure to simplify (if_then_else (ne (zero_extract:SI (const_int 0 [0x0]) (const_int 1 [0x1]) (const_int 0 [0x0])) (const_int 0 [0x0])) (label_ref 71) (pc))) -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[cond-optab] worse code with|[cond-optab] worse code with |bitfields on v850 and |bitfields on v850, mn10300, |mn10300 |avr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39722