From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10132 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2009 18:28:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 10100 invoked by uid 48); 16 Apr 2009 18:28:04 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090416182804.10099.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/39731] Separate warning classes for maybe-uninitialized and known-uninitialized variables. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg01390.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 18:28 ------- >The problem is that GCC does not give an error It can't give an error for that code as it is only runtime undefined and it does not have to be invoked at runtime (i.e. the function is not called). -- Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39731