public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/19771] VLA deallocation
[not found] <bug-19771-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2009-03-29 22:37 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-29 22:38 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-29 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-29 22:36 -------
Created an attachment (id=17557)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17557&action=view)
Always create a new BIND_EXPR for VLA decls
I tried to make use of scopes: If a label is defined in a parent scope, start a
new BIND_EXPR. This did not work.
So the attached patch takes the brute-force approach. When optimizing, this
_should_ not hurt, but we get two __builtin_stack_restore calls now.
Apparently Jakub's PR23848 fix doesn't work for our case.
Anyway, this patch does, of course, make the test case of comment #0 run.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19771
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/19771] VLA deallocation
[not found] <bug-19771-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2009-03-29 22:37 ` [Bug c/19771] VLA deallocation steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-29 22:38 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-19 20:20 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-19 20:21 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-29 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-29 22:38 -------
Jakub, this is what we discussed last night.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
BugsThisDependsOn| |23848
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19771
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/19771] VLA deallocation
[not found] <bug-19771-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2009-03-29 22:37 ` [Bug c/19771] VLA deallocation steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-29 22:38 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-19 20:20 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-19 20:21 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-19 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-19 20:20 -------
Subject: Bug 19771
Author: jsm28
Date: Sun Apr 19 20:19:54 2009
New Revision: 146358
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146358
Log:
PR c/19771
* c-semantics.c (pop_stmt_list): Propagate
STATEMENT_LIST_HAS_LABEL to parent statement list.
testsuite:
* gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c-semantics.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19771
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/19771] VLA deallocation
[not found] <bug-19771-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-19 20:20 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-19 20:21 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-19 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-19 20:21 -------
Fixed for 4.5.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work| |4.5.0
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19771
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/19771] VLA deallocation
[not found] <20050203013853.19771.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>
@ 2005-02-12 15:33 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-12 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-12 00:09 -------
The problem here is that the C front end is not creating a new BIND_EXPR
for the scope starting at the declaration for X. Insert one by hand and
you'll see that the tree optimizers are doing the right thing.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2005-02-03 02:35:43 |2005-02-12 00:09:28
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19771
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-19 20:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-19771-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2009-03-29 22:37 ` [Bug c/19771] VLA deallocation steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-29 22:38 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-19 20:20 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-19 20:21 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <20050203013853.19771.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>
2005-02-12 15:33 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).