public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
@ 2009-04-18 15:04 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-18 15:04 ` [Bug testsuite/39807] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 more replies)
0 siblings, 19 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-18 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
When running dg-extract-results on powerpc-darwin (I have not tried on other
targets), I get the following error message from awk:
awk: /tmp/dg-combine-results-13477-nUnyyO/list27 makes too many open files
input record number 11671, file
source line number 40
So only the summary of the how many failed is generated and what actual failed.
--
Summary: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are
messed up when using -j
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-18 15:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-18 15:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-18 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-18 15:04 ` [Bug testsuite/39807] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-18 15:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-20 8:10 ` [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-18 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-18 15:17 -------
Same on Solaris.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-04-18 15:17:21
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-18 15:04 ` [Bug testsuite/39807] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-18 15:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-20 8:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-20 9:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-20 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-20 08:09 -------
AFAIK this has been backported to branches/gcc-4_3-branch as well by Janis.
You haven't said on which tool this triggers (gcc, or libstdc++, or something
else), e.g. on gcc there are around 164 different Running lines, so your number
of opened files limit would be extremely low.
In any case, I'll try to play with close in some spots of guts.awk, but will
need testing on the targets with unusable awk.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.4/4.5 Regression] |[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]
|Reporting of testsuite |Reporting of testsuite
|failures are messed up when |failures are messed up when
|using -j |using -j
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-20 8:10 ` [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-20 9:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-20 11:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-20 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-20 09:37 -------
Created an attachment (id=17655)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17655&action=view)
gcc45-pr39807.patch
Please try this patch. So far I've just tested that it generates the
same results as before the patch for
dg-extract-results.sh testsuite/gcc*/*.sum.sep
dg-extract-results.sh -L testsuite/gcc*/*.log.sep
dg-extract-results.sh testsuite/ada/*/*.sum.sep
dg-extract-results.sh -L testsuite/ada/*/*.log.sep
and am doing a full bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
But given that I can't reproduce the original problem, this is just a guess
what might be a problem, so testing on darwin and/or solaris is needed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-20 9:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-20 11:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-20 17:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-20 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-20 11:02 -------
It bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux just fine (both with
-j48), results were merged correctly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-20 11:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-20 17:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-20 22:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-20 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-20 17:36 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> and am doing a full bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
> But given that I can't reproduce the original problem, this is just a guess
> what might be a problem, so testing on darwin and/or solaris is needed.
This works for powerpc-darwin.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-20 17:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-20 22:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-21 15:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-20 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-20 22:01 -------
And it works correctly on i386-darwin too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-20 22:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-21 15:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-22 13:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-21 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.4.0 |4.4.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-21 15:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-22 13:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-25 19:03 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-22 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|4.4.1 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-22 13:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-25 19:03 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-25 19:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-25 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 19:02 -------
Another nit on Solaris 9:
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes 773
# of unexpected failures 0
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/nfs/nile/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/gcc'
nawk: syntax error at source line 5
context is
>>> /= <<<
nawk: bailing out at source line 5
nawk: syntax error at source line 5
context is
>>> /= <<<
nawk: bailing out at source line 5
so no results are reported for ACATS.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-25 19:03 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-25 19:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-25 20:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-25 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 19:22 -------
Very useful awk implementation. Not.
Anyway, can you try
sed -i -e 's,/==,/.=,' contrib/dg-extract-results.sh
or
sed -i -e 's,/==,/[=]=,' contrib/dg-extract-results.sh
or
sed -i -e 's,/==,/^.*==,' contrib/dg-extract-results.sh
? I guess the last one would be best.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-25 19:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-25 20:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-25 22:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-25 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 20:27 -------
> Anyway, can you try
> sed -i -e 's,/==,/.=,' contrib/dg-extract-results.sh
> or
> sed -i -e 's,/==,/[=]=,' contrib/dg-extract-results.sh
> or
> sed -i -e 's,/==,/^.*==,' contrib/dg-extract-results.sh
> ? I guess the last one would be best.
Thanks, the last one works. But then nawk chokes on
print > "${TMP}/chapter-"chapter
so I additionally need:
/^Running chapter / {
if (chapter) close ("${TMP}/chapter-"chapter)
chapter=\$3
file="${TMP}/chapter-"chapter
print >> file
next
}
and
{
if (print_prologue) { print; next }
if (chapter) {
file="${TMP}/chapter-"chapter
print >> file
}
}
With all the changes I get a correct ACATS log file (at least manually).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-25 20:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-25 22:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-25 22:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-25 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 22:47 -------
Created an attachment (id=17693)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17693&action=view)
gcc45-pr39807.patch
Does this work too?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-25 22:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-25 22:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-27 19:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-25 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 22:57 -------
> Does this work too?
Yes, it does, thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-25 22:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-27 19:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-27 19:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-27 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 19:11 -------
Subject: Bug 39807
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 27 19:11:23 2009
New Revision: 146850
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146850
Log:
PR testsuite/39807
* dg-extract-results.sh: Close open files and use >> instead of >
to decrease number of concurrently open files from awk. Avoid
= at the beginning of a regexp and redirect to a file determined
by curfile variable rather than concatenated strings to workaround
Solaris nawk bug.
Modified:
trunk/contrib/ChangeLog
trunk/contrib/dg-extract-results.sh
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-27 19:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-27 19:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-27 21:18 ` [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-27 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 19:13 -------
Subject: Bug 39807
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 27 19:13:16 2009
New Revision: 146851
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146851
Log:
PR testsuite/39807
* dg-extract-results.sh: Close open files and use >> instead of >
to decrease number of concurrently open files from awk. Avoid
= at the beginning of a regexp and redirect to a file determined
by curfile variable rather than concatenated strings to workaround
Solaris nawk bug.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/contrib/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/contrib/dg-extract-results.sh
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-27 19:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-27 21:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-27 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 21:17 -------
Fixed for 4.4/4.5 so far.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] |[4.3 Regression] Reporting
|Reporting of testsuite |of testsuite failures are
|failures are messed up when |messed up when using -j
|using -j |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-27 21:18 ` [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:30 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-22 18:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:13 -------
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-22 18:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-18 15:04 [Bug testsuite/39807] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] Reporting of testsuite failures are messed up when using -j pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-18 15:04 ` [Bug testsuite/39807] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-18 15:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-20 8:10 ` [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-20 9:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-20 11:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-20 17:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-20 22:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-21 15:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-22 13:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-25 19:03 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-25 19:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-25 20:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-25 22:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-25 22:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-27 19:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-27 19:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-27 21:18 ` [Bug testsuite/39807] [4.3 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).