From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19740 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2009 18:31:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 19416 invoked by uid 48); 22 Apr 2009 18:30:47 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090422183047.19415.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug inline-asm/39847] 16 symbolic register names generates error: more than 30 operands in 'asm' In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "d at teklibre dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg02017.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #16 from d at teklibre dot com 2009-04-22 18:30 ------- @Jakub/Andrew: max_recog_operands = MIN(FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER*2,SOME_SANE_VALUE_DERIVED_FROM_SMASHING_THE_STACK_ON_IA64) ; // ? I certainly am not in a position to make a one line change to gcc and test it on ia64 or other insane architectures like vmx,intel avx, etc, etc... I also somehow doubt that a human could deal with 668 registers (a code generator might) this human, at least, copes with 32 registers just fine. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39847