From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21906 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2009 18:34:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 21799 invoked by uid 48); 22 Apr 2009 18:33:52 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090422183352.21798.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/39491] [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signbitl@GLIBCXX_3.4 in libstdc++ not exported anymore In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "carlos at codesourcery dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg02018.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #16 from carlos at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-22 18:33 ------- So what is required to close this issue? * Original submitter is incorrect, there has never been a __signbitl@GLIBCXX_3.4 symbol, and there should not be one now? * glibc on hppa-linux-gnu has never had a __signbitl symbol. * I have changed the glibc hppa-linux-gnu port to define __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH, and therefore the signbit macro, even in the abscense of optimization, will always return a valid signbit function based on the type size. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491