From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18982 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2009 21:58:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 18905 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2009 21:58:03 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090422215803.18904.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/39855] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Shift optimization discards operands' side effects In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg02049.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 21:58 ------- Subject: Bug 39855 Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 22 21:57:52 2009 New Revision: 146617 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146617 Log: PR c/39855 * fold-const.c (fold_binary) : When optimizing into 0, use omit_one_operand. * gcc.dg/torture/pr39855.c: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr39855.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fold-const.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39855