public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/33237]  New: Tree memory partitioning is spending 430 seconds of a 490 second compile.
@ 2007-08-29 18:52 bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-08-29 18:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/33237] " bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (25 more replies)
  0 siblings, 26 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-08-29 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

The tree memory partitioning phase is spending 430 seconds of a 490 second
compile which seems a little excessive. The test case is a slightly modified
version of another test case within bugzilla (I forget which one) but with some
syntax warning cleaned up. I'm using GCC mainline revision 127398. I'll attach
the test case in the next post. The relevant parts of the -ftime-report output
looks like:

gcc -O1 -S -ftime-report syntax-case.i

Execution times (seconds)
[snip]
 tree memory partitioning: 433.26 (88%) usr   0.03 ( 1%) sys 433.29 (87%) wall 
     0 kB ( 0%) ggc
[snip]
 TOTAL                 : 491.34             4.19           495.53            
199506 kB


-- 
           Summary: Tree memory partitioning is spending 430 seconds of a
                    490 second compile.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: powerpc64-linux
  GCC host triplet: powerpc64-linux
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33237


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-33237-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-27 14:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-29 18:52 [Bug tree-optimization/33237] New: Tree memory partitioning is spending 430 seconds of a 490 second compile bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-29 18:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/33237] " bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-29 20:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/33237] [4.3 Regression]Tree " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-29 20:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-05  2:23 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-01 15:38 ` [Bug tree-optimization/33237] [4.3 Regression] Tree " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-02 23:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 12:58 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 14:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 15:16 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-25 17:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-25 17:43 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2008-01-25 18:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-14 17:01 ` [Bug tree-optimization/33237] [4.3/4.4 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-06 15:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-06 20:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-27 22:05 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-07 11:57 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-07 12:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-08 15:04 ` dnovillo at google dot com
2009-01-24 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-23 13:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-03 10:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/33237] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-03 10:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/33237] [4.3/4.4 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-23  9:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-33237-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-06-27 14:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).