From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20680 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2009 10:29:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 20648 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2009 10:29:38 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090424102938.20647.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/39867] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Wrong result of conditional operator exp < 2 ? 2U : (unsigned int) exp In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg02231.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-04-24 10:29 ------- Subject: Bug 39867 Author: bonzini Date: Fri Apr 24 10:29:18 2009 New Revision: 146695 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146695 Log: 2009-04-24 Paolo Bonzini PR middle-end/39867 * fold-const.c (fold_cond_expr_with_comparison): When folding > and >= to MAX, make sure the MAX uses the same type as the comparison operands. testsuite: 2009-04-24 Paolo Bonzini PR middle-end/39867 * gcc.dg/pr39867.c: New. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr39867.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fold-const.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39867