public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/39908] New: Aligned access to unaligned address
@ 2009-04-26 12:51 irar at il dot ibm dot com
2009-04-26 16:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/39908] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: irar at il dot ibm dot com @ 2009-04-26 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The following code (a reduced gcc.target/x86_64/abi/test_struct_returning.c)
fails during execution with segmentation fault when compiled with -O1
-ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model asm-support.S (in directory
gcc.target/x86_64/abi/):
#include <stdio.h>
#include "defines.h"
#include "macros.h"
#include "args.h"
struct S_600
{
float f[4];
};
struct S_600 f_600 ()
{
struct S_600 s;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
s.f[i] = 42;
return s;
}
int
main (void)
{
struct S_600 s;
s = WRAP_RET(f_600) ();
return 0;
}
The failure occurs in
0x000000000040063b in f_600 ()
1: x/i $pc 0x40063b <f_600+7>: movaps %xmm0,0xffffffffffffffd8(%rsp)
(gdb)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000000000040063b in f_600 ()
1: x/i $pc 0x40063b <f_600+7>: movaps %xmm0,0xffffffffffffffd8(%rsp)
rsp 0x7fff408944c0 0x7fff408944c0
xmm0 {v4_float = {0x2a, 0x2a, 0x2a, 0x2a}, v2_double = {0xc00002114,
0xc00002114}, v16_int8 = {0x0, 0x0, 0x28,
0x42, 0x0, 0x0, 0x28, 0x42, 0x0, 0x0, 0x28, 0x42, 0x0, 0x0, 0x28, 0x42},
v8_int16 = {0x0, 0x4228, 0x0, 0x4228, 0x0,
0x4228, 0x0, 0x4228}, v4_int32 = {0x42280000, 0x42280000, 0x42280000,
0x42280000}, v2_int64 = {0x4228000042280000,
0x4228000042280000}, uint128 = 0x42280000422800004228000042280000}
The alignment is forced by the vectorizer in function
vect_compute_data_ref_alignment() the same way as in pass
pass_ipa_increase_alignment. But if 's' is global and not local in f_600 (i.e.,
when the alignment is forced in pass_ipa_increase_alignment) there is no
segfault.
I also tried to remove WRAP_RET(), and put f_600 and main in different files
(in order to prevent their elimination). But this way there was no segfault
either.
Another check: if the vectorizer forces alignment but also uses peeling (with
the help of a hack), there is still a segfault:
0x000000000040065f in f_600 ()
1: x/i $pc 0x40065f <f_600+43>: movaps 362(%rip),%xmm0 #
0x4007d0 <_IO_stdin_used+16>
(gdb)
1: x/i $pc 0x400666 <f_600+50>: movaps %xmm0,(%rdx)
(gdb)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000000000400666 in f_600 ()
1: x/i $pc 0x400666 <f_600+50>: movaps %xmm0,(%rdx)
(gdb) info all-registers
rdx 0x7fff2a759358 140733905736536
rip 0x400666 0x400666 <f_600+50>
If after forcing the alignment, the vectorizer escapes and doesn't do anything
else, there is no segfault.
--
Summary: Aligned access to unaligned address
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: irar at il dot ibm dot com
GCC build triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
GCC target triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39908
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/39908] Aligned access to unaligned address
2009-04-26 12:51 [Bug tree-optimization/39908] New: Aligned access to unaligned address irar at il dot ibm dot com
@ 2009-04-26 16:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-26 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-26 16:54 -------
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39907 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39908
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-26 16:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-26 12:51 [Bug tree-optimization/39908] New: Aligned access to unaligned address irar at il dot ibm dot com
2009-04-26 16:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/39908] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).